HomeGreen TechnologyWhy So Many Non-BEV Vans in NACFE's Run on Much less?

Why So Many Non-BEV Vans in NACFE’s Run on Much less?



Help CleanTechnica’s work by way of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.


America North American Council for Freight Effectivity’s (NACFE) Run on Much less is underway once more, and the lineup is broad. Battery electrics are sharing the street with renewable diesel tractors, pure fuel vehicles, and a pair of hydrogen gasoline cell models. That selection is fascinating as a result of it displays the alternatives fleets are literally making. It additionally raises a easy query. If the mission is to showcase actual world freight effectivity and decrease emissions, why are there so many vehicles that don’t ship on both value or greenhouse gases while you normalize their efficiency to the identical yardsticks? The reply is, hopefully, to current the outcomes with the precise metrics, entrance and heart, so the business can see which paths actually ship higher.

Screen grab of NACFE instrumented trucks from Run on Less website
Screengrab of NACFE instrumented vehicles from Run on Much less web site.

Run on Much less is designed to place finest apply within the open. Drivers, dispatchers, and technicians present how they function. NACFE and RMI publish the information. This yr’s “messy center” theme presumably has a objective. It gathers choices that fleets take into account to be believable and places them on the identical area. The danger is {that a} public dashboard stuffed with pace traces and cost curves can muddle the story if it doesn’t lead with the outcomes that matter. Price per mile and properly to wheel emissions per mile ought to open each part. If these two numbers are up entrance, the remainder of the charts develop into context moderately than a distraction.

Vehicles by energy source for NACFE Run on Less 2025 by author
Autos by vitality supply for NACFE Run on Much less 2025, by writer.

The 2 vital metrics are easy to outline. Price per mile is the delivered vitality value to maneuver a loaded truck by way of a given route and local weather. Nicely to wheel emissions per mile are the greenhouse gases from vitality manufacturing, supply, and use, normalized to the identical 1,000 miles of labor. Each should be grounded within the particular obligation cycle and the situation the place the truck is operating. Grid carbon depth in California will not be the identical as Arizona. Hydrogen constructed from pure fuel will not be the identical as hydrogen made with constrained renewables. Methane and hydrogen have close to time period warming results that matter for coverage and funding. Displaying GWP20 beside GWP100 makes that clear with out arguing about time horizons.

The strategies may be said in plain language. For battery electrics, use every truck’s kWh per mile from lifelike fleet values, apply typical charging losses and native transmission and distribution losses, and multiply by the regional grid carbon depth. For renewable diesel, use life cycle carbon depth by feedstock, assume diesel parity on miles per gallon except the fleet shares higher information, and multiply by present retail costs. For pure fuel, convert the obligation cycle into diesel gallon equivalents, apply upstream methane leakage charges and engine methane slip, and use CNG or LNG retail costs. For hydrogen, begin with actual retail pumped costs that embed manufacturing, supply, storage, and meting out, add consumption close to 9 kg per 100 km for present gasoline cell tractors, and embody course of CO2 if the hydrogen is made in a steam methane reformer, upstream methane leakage on the pure fuel that feeds the reformer, and hydrogen leakage alongside the chain. None of that is unique. It’s a clear boundary round how the vitality reaches the axle. As a result of NACFE hasn’t run the numbers, I’ve.

Average greenhouse gas emissions in kg CO2e per 1,000 miles by author
Common greenhouse fuel emissions in kg CO2e per 1,000 miles, by writer
Average energy costs per 1,000 miles by author
Common vitality prices per 1,000 miles, by writer.

The derived numbers from this Run are already informative. The 5 battery electrical vehicles are operating in California and Arizona. Utilizing lifelike efficiencies and the eGRID 2022 carbon components for these subregions, the California models land close to 406, 406, 430, and 499 kg CO2e per 1,000 miles when you embody charging and grid losses, whereas the Arizona unit on the next carbon grid is available in close to 716 kg. The straightforward common is about 492 kg per 1,000 miles. The delivered vitality value follows the identical sample. Utilizing present business tariffs, these 4 California vehicles sit within the $455 to $558 band for 1,000 miles of labor and the Arizona truck is close to $250. Averaging throughout the 5 offers a tough $440 per 1,000 miles. None of this requires heroics on the depot. It’s the product of first rate charging home windows and the grid that exists right now.

Renewable diesel seems acceptable at first look, which is a part of why fleets purchase it. On a central life cycle carbon depth of roughly 30 g CO2e per MJ, a Class 8 tractor at 7.77 mpg lands close to 501 kg CO2e per 1,000 miles. The vitality value utilizing latest retail costs is close to $633 per 1,000 miles. Nuance issues. If the gasoline is constructed from used cooking oil or tallow, the life cycle quantity may be decrease. If the gasoline is constructed from crop oils like soy or canola, the quantity strikes up towards diesel. Waste based mostly volumes are restricted and are already spoken for in lots of areas. Feedstock disclosure will not be a nicety. It modifications the result by lots of of kilograms over 1,000 miles.

Pure fuel faces a physics drawback moderately than a advertising and marketing drawback. Spark ignited engines nonetheless slip methane on the tailpipe and upstream provide chains nonetheless leak methane throughout manufacturing and processing. On a GWP20 foundation that mixture dominates the local weather math. An inexpensive central case for this yr’s lengthy haul obligation cycles is about 2,099 kg CO2e per 1,000 miles. Pump costs can look aggressive, however the local weather value doesn’t transfer with a less expensive gallon gasoline equal (GGE). A CNG tractor at about 6.5 miles per diesel fuel equal (DGE) will spend close to $540 per 1,000 miles on vitality at present averages. LNG is nearer to $728. These numbers don’t rescue the emissions outcome. Higher engines and decrease leak charges would assist, however fleets don’t management basins, gathering traces, or processing crops. They solely see the nozzle.

Hydrogen gasoline cells are probably the most misaligned with the Run’s mission in right now’s U.S. situations when provide is steam methane reforming and retail costs replicate liquefaction and supply, the most certainly sources of hydrogen for the 2 gasoline cell vehicles. With present pumped costs close to $27 per kg and consumption close to 145 kg per 1,000 miles, the vitality invoice is about $3,926 for a similar work {that a} battery electrical does for roughly one tenth of that on many grids. The greenhouse fuel final result can also be poor while you embody reformer CO2, upstream methane on the pure fuel that feeds the reformer, and hydrogen leakage. A central case is close to 2,245 kg CO2e per 1,000 miles on a GWP20 foundation. These figures don’t embody the additional vitality used for liquefaction or boil off in logistics, so they don’t seem to be inflated by hidden assumptions. Electrolytic hydrogen made on a clear grid may change the story, however on the grids the place freight truly runs right now that path is pricey and constrained.

A diesel comparator helps floor the dialogue. At 7.77 mpg, which is a stage environment friendly fleets attain on freeway obligation cycles, diesel lands close to 1,830 kg CO2e per 1,000 miles and round $481 in vitality value at nationwide averages. That places renewable diesel with good feedstocks barely cleaner than diesel and barely dearer, and it leaves battery electrical clearly cleaner than each whereas additionally cheaper to gasoline in the identical areas. It additionally underlines how far pure fuel and steam methane reformer hydrogen sit from the mission while you current outcomes moderately than inputs.

For this reason the NACFE wants bar charts, not a dense scoreboard. The primary is properly to wheel greenhouse gases per 1,000 miles. Every bar ought to present the key parts. Battery electrics ought to carry grid technology emissions and charging and grid losses for the particular subregion. Renewable diesel ought to present a central bar with whiskers that span waste oils on the low finish and crop oils on the excessive finish in order that readers see the feedstock dependency. Pure fuel ought to cut up tailpipe CO2 from methane results and carry two labels for GWP20 and GWP100 so the quick lived forcing is express. Hydrogen ought to embody reformer CO2, upstream methane, and a separate phase for hydrogen leakage. The assumptions can dwell in a transparent footnote so fleet managers can replicate the maths on their very own routes.

The second bar chart ought to current delivered vitality value per 1,000 miles utilizing the identical x axis order. Battery electrical ought to use the native business tariff and embody conversion losses. Renewable diesel and diesel ought to use latest retail costs with the identical mpg. Pure fuel ought to present a CNG bar and an LNG bar so route and station selections are seen. Hydrogen ought to use a pumped retail worth that embeds manufacturing, supply, storage, and meting out and present a shaded band for the noticed vary. A reader ought to be capable to look left to proper and see that battery electrical sits lowest on emissions and among the many lowest on value in these areas, renewable diesel is workable however behind, and pure fuel and SMR hydrogen are excessive on each metrics.

Together with non BEVs nonetheless has worth. Actual world information on alternate options reveals true working constraints and ends debates which can be based mostly on promise moderately than efficiency. The problem is communication. With out normalized final result charts, informal readers can stroll away considering that every part on the street is in the identical league. The bar charts forestall that. They respect the viewers’s time and present the tradeoffs clearly.

There are just a few disclosures that may make the Run stronger. Hydrogen supply and worth needs to be express. Renewable diesel feedstock needs to be named. Pure fuel methane assumptions needs to be said with ranges and citations. Battery electrical kWh per mile needs to be proven beside the grid subregion code so readers can join the dots. Responsibility cycle notes ought to embody common pace, payload band, temperature, and elevation change so variations are seen.

When fleets have a look at this by way of a procurement lens the image is sensible. Battery electrical suits extra obligation cycles each quarter. It asks for planning on depot energy and charging home windows, not a leap of religion. Renewable biofuels could be a bridge for legacy belongings if feedstocks are waste based mostly and volumes can be found, and can, regardless, be pivoting to their finish state markets of aviation and transport. Pure fuel stays a local weather threat that fleets can’t management. Hydrogen wants very low carbon provide at very low value and low leakage, plus dependable heavy obligation stations, earlier than it will possibly carry its weight on these routes.

The rating may change as situations change. Quicker grid decarbonization and cheaper business energy enhance battery electrical even additional. Waste oil provide is restricted and won’t scale to decarbonize heavy freight by itself. Verified single digit methane leakage and higher engines would assist pure fuel however don’t erase the hole on close to time period warming. Hydrogen would wish a mix of low cost clear technology, excessive electrolyzer capability components, minimal leakage, and a dense community of stations to compete, and people components usually are not in place within the working areas featured this yr.

Run on Much less succeeds when it makes the environment friendly path apparent. Placing value per mile and properly to wheel emissions per mile on the high of the dashboard aligns the occasion with its mission. The info from this yr reveals a easy sample. Renewable diesel might help within the quick time period, however battery electrical is already pulling away on each value and carbon the place these vehicles are operating. If the Run retains these two numbers entrance and heart, fleets, shippers, and regulators could have what they should transfer quicker.


Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive stage summaries, join our day by day publication, and observe us on Google Information!


Commercial



 


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us right here.


Join our day by day publication for 15 new cleantech tales a day. Or join our weekly one on high tales of the week if day by day is just too frequent.



CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.

CleanTechnica’s Remark Coverage




RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments