
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Overlook summer time already; it’s software program season, and it’s positively raining betas. Between Android 16 and the brand new iOS 26, I’ve been knee-deep in cell OSs and, effectively… I’ve notes.
In the event you’re an everyday reader, you would possibly know that I’m not an enormous fan of Google’s new Materials 3 Expressive. I don’t hate it, however actually don’t love its paranoia of something approaching a right-angle. However in comparison with what Apple’s been cooking up in iOS 26, Materials 3 Expressive appears to be like just like the modern-day Creation of Adam.
Which UI design is greatest?
901 votes
Like Android’s newest redesign, iOS 26 and its new “Liquid Glass” UI are constructed to be extra reactive and conscious of the consumer’s aesthetic desire. It’s additionally designed to unify the look throughout Apple’s product portfolio. Nonetheless, it falls effectively in need of the mark.
I’m positive you’ve seen loads of pictures of it on-line already, and it’s as positively illegible as everybody says. Extreme use of transparency and refraction makes any overlay menu a headache-inducing mess and, from an accessibility standpoint, it’s a catastrophe.
Materials 3 Expressive would possibly look flat by comparability, however its wise, configurable shade palettes keep away from these sorts of jarring clashes and eyesores. It’s simple to learn and navigate, and will get the job completed with a splash of straightforward customization.
A UI must be practical at the start, a lesson Apple has seemingly forgotten with Liquid Glass. Apple critically must dial the transparency again earlier than this ships. As well as, my iPhone 15 Professional has been extremely sizzling and chugs down battery life since updating to iOS 26. It’s too early to inform if these graphics-heavy results are accountable, however there’s a purpose Home windows ditched Vista’s Aero Glass theme.
Liquid Glass is not simply headache-inducing, it is an accessibility nightmare.
Apple additionally launched icon theming again with iOS 18 and has a brand new clear choice to actually cement its Glass design change. Nonetheless, the dearth of any shade deprives icons of prompt recognition, making the entire UI more durable to navigate. Whereas Google’s color-themed icon efforts aren’t nice, a minimum of they’re simply distinguished from the background. Android additionally gives a lot smarter customized theming throughout the UI, making settings and choices simple to see at a look, no matter your shade palette. Apple nonetheless doesn’t do this, and its newest glass icons are too arduous to eyeball. It’s unhealthy design — plain and easy.
To be truthful, the glass impact isn’t horrible when paired with apps that supply principally stable background colours. Nonetheless, utilizing it side-by-side with Google’s newest tweaks, it’s arduous to not conclude that Apple isn’t all for bettering performance. The digital camera app is a main instance; outsized cartoonish bubbles and a labyrinth of hidden layers have changed the glossy, simply accessible, camera-inspired structure.
Customization is King

Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Placing questionable aesthetic selections apart for a minute, iOS 26 apes Materials 3 Expressive with its customizable “Management Heart,” aka Android’s Fast Settings menu. Now you can rearrange and resize icons, permitting you to suit roughly on display, relying in your wants.
In some methods, iOS 26 permits for much more customization with the power to stretch toggles each vertically and horizontally. The media middle, as an example, could be made taller or shorter relying on how a lot data you wish to show, and even moved round, which you’ll’t do on Android. Nonetheless, some toggles can’t be resized in each path, so once more, it may look a large number.
Nonetheless, Apple’s UI implementation is the true situation for me. Android 16 separates resizing and repositioning by requiring a long-press on the toggle. iOS makes an attempt to do each concurrently, which means it’s all too simple to pull as a substitute of resize, inflicting a Microsoft Phrase-style cascade of structure chaos. I discovered it infuriating to make use of.
Likewise, Android has addressed a major redundancy bugbear; the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth toggles now straight open a small window so that you can configure the required settings. iOS 26 is caught someplace between, permitting you to toggle Wi-Fi on/off shortly however not Bluetooth, which requires you to leap by a number of menus to seek out the pairing web page. Completely different outcomes relying on press length or location simply add to the insanity.
Throwing stones at Apple’s glass home

Robert Triggs / Android Authority
After spending an admittedly quick time flipping by the newest variations of Android and iOS, I’ve come away with a major distinction in thoughts.
Whereas not good, Materials 3 Expressive is primarily centered on making Android extra user-friendly. It’s extra customizable, tweaked to current data extra clearly, and contains new additions like Reside Updates. It’s a quality-of-life enchancment to an OS we already like; an improve reasonably than a redesign.
iOS 26, by comparability, is nearly all about appearances. Cherry-pick Liquid Glass on the appropriate backdrop and it appears to be like nice, however the replace fixes little or no of my long-running bugbears when navigating the OS. Customization is marginally higher, however nonetheless solely pores and skin deep and too typically breaks its personal aesthetic guidelines. Menus stay a laborious back-and-forth arm wrestle that’s now arguably worse in locations, and the glass design hampers reasonably than helps readability. It’s a lick of paint on a creaking basis.
A flashy redesign cannot cowl up Apple’s lack of AI management.
The cynic in me would possibly accuse Apple of making an attempt to divert consideration away from its lack of real concepts and abysmal state of Apple Intelligence with a shiny new interface. In any case, these are the highest two enhancements within the iOS 26 press equipment. Nonetheless, the implementation is so poor that I’m now genuinely involved concerning the platform’s path of journey. Significantly, who let this beta cross high quality management?
To cite ex-Apple design chief, Jonny Ive, again on the launch of iOS 7 in 2013: “I believe there’s a profound and enduring magnificence in simplicity; in readability, in effectivity. True simplicity is derived from a lot extra than simply the absence of litter and ornamentation. It’s about bringing order to complexity.”
I’ll depart you to determine which fashionable cell OS greatest lives as much as that mantra.