HomeRoboticsWhat If the Huge Bang Wasn’t the Starting? Analysis Suggests It Could...

What If the Huge Bang Wasn’t the Starting? Analysis Suggests It Could Have Taken Place Inside a Black Gap


The Huge Bang is commonly described because the explosive start of the universe—a singular second when house, time, and matter sprang into existence. However what if this was not the start in any respect? What if our universe emerged from one thing else—one thing extra acquainted and radical on the identical time?

In a brand new paper, revealed in Bodily Evaluation D (full preprint right here), my colleagues and I suggest a hanging different. Our calculations recommend the Huge Bang was not the beginning of the whole lot, however somewhat the end result of a gravitational crunch or collapse that shaped a really huge black gap—adopted by a bounce inside it.

This concept, which we name the black gap universe, gives a radically completely different view of cosmic origins, but it’s grounded solely in identified physics and observations.

Right now’s commonplace cosmological mannequin, primarily based on the Huge Bang and cosmic inflation (the concept the early universe quickly blew up in measurement), has been remarkably profitable in explaining the construction and evolution of the universe. However it comes at a value: It leaves a number of the most elementary questions unanswered.

For one, the Huge Bang mannequin begins with a singularity—a degree of infinite density the place the legal guidelines of physics break down. This isn’t only a technical glitch; it’s a deep theoretical drawback that implies we don’t actually perceive the start in any respect.

To elucidate the universe’s large-scale construction, physicists launched a short part of fast enlargement into the early universe known as cosmic inflation, powered by an unknown subject with unusual properties. Later, to elucidate the accelerating enlargement noticed at this time, they added one other “mysterious” element: darkish power.

In brief, the usual mannequin of cosmology works effectively—however solely by introducing new components we’ve got by no means noticed immediately. In the meantime, probably the most primary questions stay open: The place did the whole lot come from? Why did it start this manner? And why is the universe so flat, easy, and enormous?

New Mannequin

Our new mannequin tackles these questions from a special angle—by trying inward as an alternative of outward. As an alternative of beginning with an increasing universe and making an attempt to hint again the way it started, we contemplate what occurs when a very dense assortment of matter collapses underneath gravity.

It is a acquainted course of: Stars collapse into black holes, that are among the many most well-understood objects in physics. However what occurs inside a black gap, past the occasion horizon from which nothing can escape, stays a thriller.

In 1965, the British physicist Roger Penrose proved that underneath very basic situations, gravitational collapse should result in a singularity. This outcome, prolonged by the late British physicist Stephen Hawking and others, underpins the concept singularities—just like the one on the Huge Bang—are unavoidable.

The concept helped win Penrose a share of the 2020 Nobel prize in physics and impressed Hawking’s world bestseller A Temporary Historical past of Time: From the Huge Bang to Black Holes. However there’s a caveat. These “singularity theorems” depend on “classical physics” which describes abnormal macroscopic objects. If we embody the consequences of quantum mechanics, which guidelines the tiny microcosmos of atoms and particles, as we should at excessive densities, the story could change.

In our new paper, we present that gravitational collapse doesn’t have to finish in a singularity. We discover an actual analytical answer—a mathematical outcome with no approximations. Our math reveals that as we method the potential singularity, the dimensions of the universe adjustments as a (hyperbolic) operate of cosmic time.

This straightforward mathematical answer describes how a collapsing cloud of matter can attain a high-density state after which bounce, rebounding outward into a brand new increasing part.

However why do Penrose’s theorems forbid such outcomes? It’s all all the way down to a rule known as the quantum exclusion precept, which states that no two an identical particles referred to as fermions can occupy the identical quantum state (akin to angular momentum, or “spin”).

And we present that this rule prevents the particles within the collapsing matter from being squeezed indefinitely. Consequently, the collapse halts and reverses. The bounce is just not solely doable—it’s inevitable underneath the proper situations.

Crucially, this bounce happens solely throughout the framework of basic relativity, which applies on giant scales akin to stars and galaxies, mixed with the fundamental ideas of quantum mechanics—no unique fields, additional dimensions, or speculative physics required.

What emerges on the opposite aspect of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our personal. Much more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the 2 separate phases of accelerated enlargement—inflation and darkish power—pushed not by hypothetical fields however by the physics of the bounce itself.

Testable Predictions

One of many strengths of this mannequin is that it makes testable predictions. It predicts a small however non-zero quantity of optimistic spatial curvature—which means the universe is just not precisely flat, however barely curved, just like the floor of the Earth.

That is merely a relic of the preliminary small over-density that triggered the collapse. If future observations, akin to the continuing Euclid mission, affirm a small optimistic curvature, it will be a powerful trace that our universe did certainly emerge from such a bounce. It additionally makes predictions concerning the present universe’s price of enlargement, one thing that has already been verified.

ESA

The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying ESA’s Euclid mission on the launch pad in 2023. Picture Credit score: ESA, CC BY-SA

This mannequin does greater than repair technical issues with commonplace cosmology. It might additionally shed new mild on different deep mysteries in our understanding of the early universe—such because the origin of supermassive black holes, the character of darkish matter, or the hierarchical formation and evolution of galaxies.

These questions can be explored by future house missions akin to Arrakihs, which can research diffuse options akin to stellar halos (a spherical construction of stars and globular clusters surrounding galaxies) and satellite tv for pc galaxies (smaller galaxies that orbit bigger ones) which can be tough to detect with conventional telescopes from Earth and can assist us perceive darkish matter and galaxy evolution.

These phenomena may additionally be linked to relic compact objects—akin to black holes—that shaped throughout the collapsing part and survived the bounce.

The black gap universe additionally gives a brand new perspective on our place within the cosmos. On this framework, our whole observable universe lies inside the inside of a black gap shaped in some bigger “mother or father” universe.

We’re not particular, not more than Earth was within the geocentric worldview that led Galileo (the astronomer who advised the Earth revolves across the solar within the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries) to be positioned underneath home arrest.

We’re not witnessing the start of the whole lot from nothing, however somewhat the continuation of a cosmic cycle—one formed by gravity, quantum mechanics, and the deep interconnections between them.

This text is republished from The Dialog underneath a Artistic Commons license. Learn the unique article.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments