HomeiOS DevelopmentUtilizing the Observations framework to look at mannequin properties – Donny Wals

Utilizing the Observations framework to look at mannequin properties – Donny Wals


Revealed on: September 24, 2025

Beginning with Xcode 26, there is a new strategy to observe properties of your @Observable fashions. Prior to now, we had to make use of the withObservationTracking perform to entry properties and obtain modifications with willSet semantics. In Xcode 26 and Swift 6.2, now we have entry to a completely new method that may make observing our fashions exterior of SwiftUI a lot easier.

On this publish, we’ll check out how we will use Observations to look at mannequin properties. We’ll additionally go over a few of the attainable pitfalls and caveats related to Observations that you need to be conscious of.

Establishing an statement sequence

Swift’s new Observations object permits us to construct an AsyncSequence based mostly on properties of an @Observable mannequin.

Let’s take into account the next @Observable mannequin:

@Observable 
class Counter {
  var depend: Int
}

To illustrate we would like to look at modifications to the depend property exterior of a SwiftUI view. Perhaps we’re constructing one thing on the server or command line the place SwiftUI is not out there. Or possibly you are observing this mannequin to kick off some non-UI associated course of. It actually would not matter that a lot. The purpose of this instance is that we’re having to look at our mannequin exterior of SwiftUI’s computerized monitoring of modifications to our mannequin.

To observe our Counter with out the brand new Observations, you’d write one thing like the next:

class CounterObserver {
  let counter: Counter

  init(counter: Counter) {
    self.counter = counter
  }

  func observe() {
    withObservationTracking { 
      print("counter.depend: (counter.depend)")
    } onChange: {
      self.observe()
    }
  }
}

This makes use of withObservationTracking which comes with its personal caveats in addition to a fairly clunky API.

Once we refactor the above to work with the brand new Observations, we get one thing like this:

class CounterObserver {
  let counter: Counter

  init(counter: Counter) {
    self.counter = counter
  }

  func observe() {
    Activity { [weak self] in
      let values = Observations { [weak self] in
        guard let self else { return 0 }
        return self.counter.depend 
      }

      for await worth in values {
        guard let self else { break }
        print("counter.depend: (worth)")
      }
    }
  }
}

There are two key steps to observing modifications with Observations:

  1. Establishing your async sequence of noticed values
  2. Iterate over your statement sequence

Let’s take a better have a look at each steps to know how they work.

Establishing an async sequence of noticed values

The Observations object that we created within the instance is an async sequence. This sequence will emit values at any time when a change to our mannequin’s values is detected. Observe that Observations will solely inform us about modifications that we’re really interested by. Which means the one properties that we’re knowledgeable about are properties that we entry within the closure that we move to Observations.

This closure additionally returns a price. The returned worth is the worth that is emitted by the async sequence that we create.

On this case, we created our Observations as follows:

let values = Observations { [weak self] in
  guard let self else { return 0 }
  return self.counter.depend 
}

Which means we observe and return no matter worth our depend is.

We may additionally change our code as follows:

let values = Observations { [weak self] in
  guard let self else { return "" }
  return "counter.depend is (self.counter.depend)"
}

This code observes counter.depend however our async sequence will present us with strings as a substitute of simply the counter’s worth.

There are two issues about this code that I might wish to give attention to: reminiscence administration and the output of our statement sequence.

Let us take a look at the output first, after which we will discuss concerning the reminiscence administration implications of utilizing Observations.

Sequences created by Observations will mechanically observe all properties that you simply accessed in your Observations closure. On this case we have solely accessed a single property so we’re knowledgeable at any time when depend is modified. If we accessed extra properties, a change to any of the accessed properties will trigger us to obtain a brand new worth. No matter we return from Observations is what our async sequence will output. On this case that is a string however it may be something we wish. The properties we entry do not should be a part of our return worth. Accessing the property is sufficient to have your closure known as, even when you do not use that property to compute your return worth.

You will have in all probability seen that my Observations closure accommodates a [weak self]. Each time a change to our noticed properties occurs, the Observations closure will get known as. That signifies that internally, Observations must in some way retain our closure. On account of that, we will create a retain cycle by capturing self strongly within an Observations closure. To interrupt that, we should always use a weak seize.

This weak seize signifies that now we have an optionally available self to take care of. In my case, I opted to return an empty string as a substitute of nil. That is as a result of I do not need to should work with an optionally available worth afterward in my iteration, however if you happen to’re okay with that then there’s nothing unsuitable with returning nil as a substitute of a default worth. Do observe that returning a default worth doesn’t do any hurt so long as you are organising your iteration of the async sequence appropriately.

Talking of which, let’s take a better have a look at that.

Iterating over your statement sequence

As soon as you have arrange your Observations, you have got an async sequence which you could iterate over. This sequence will output the values that you simply return out of your Observations closure. As quickly as you begin iterating, you’ll instantly obtain the “present” worth on your statement.

Iterating over your sequence is completed with an async for loop which is why we’re wrapping this all in a Activity:

Activity { [weak self] in
  let values = Observations { [weak self] in
    guard let self else { return 0 }
    return self.counter.depend 
  }

  for await worth in values {
    guard let self else { break }
    print("counter.depend: (worth)")
  }
}

Wrapping our work in a Activity, signifies that our Activity wants a [weak self] identical to our Observations closure does. The reason being barely completely different although. If you wish to study extra about reminiscence administration in duties that comprise async for loops, I extremely advocate you learn my publish on the subject.

When iterating over our Observations sequence we’ll obtain values in our loop after they have been assigned to our @Observable mannequin. Which means Observations sequences have “did set semantics” whereas withObservationTracking would have given us “will set semantics”.

Now that we all know concerning the joyful paths of Observations, let’s discuss some caveats.

Caveats of Observations

While you observe values with Observations, the primary and major caveat that I might wish to level out is that reminiscence administration is essential to avoiding retain cycles. You have realized about this within the earlier part, and getting all of it proper could be difficult. Particularly as a result of how and if you unwrap self in your Activity is crucial. Do it earlier than the for loop and you’ve got created a reminiscence leak that’ll run till the Observations sequence ends (which it will not).

A second caveat that I might wish to level out is which you could miss values out of your Observable sequence if it produces values quicker than you are consuming them.

So for instance, if we introduce a sleep of three seconds in our loop we’ll find yourself with missed values after we produce a brand new worth each second:

for await worth in values {
  guard let self else { break }
  print(worth)
  attempt await Activity.sleep(for: .seconds(3))
}

The results of sleeping on this loop whereas we produce extra values is that we are going to miss values that have been despatched through the sleep. Each time we obtain a brand new worth, we obtain the “present” worth and we’ll miss any values that have been despatched in between.

Normally that is high-quality, however if you wish to course of each worth that obtained produced and processing may take a while, you will need to just be sure you implement some buffering of your individual. For instance, if each produced worth would lead to a community name you’d need to just be sure you do not await the community name within your loop since there is a good probability that you simply’d miss values if you do this.

General, I feel Observations is a big enchancment over the instruments we had earlier than Observations got here round. Enhancements could be made within the buffering division however I feel for lots of purposes the present scenario is sweet sufficient to provide it a attempt.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments