Trump’s assault on UN transport deal is a harbinger of what’s to return. Right here’s how international locations can nonetheless get local weather motion carried out.

Assist CleanTechnica’s work via a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

By William Todts

The UN’s Worldwide Maritime Group isn’t usually a spot that grabs the headlines. However the scenes that unfolded in London earlier this month had been unprecedented. The US authorities, led by the President and his secretary of state, invested huge political capital to threaten, cajole and intimidate different international locations to destroy a local weather deal international locations had agreed in precept solely 6 months earlier.

“The US will NOT stand for this World Inexperienced New Rip-off Tax on Transport,” wrote Trump on social media. The menace was clear: vote for this deal and face punishment from the world’s superpower. US bullying was profitable and IMO member states agreed to a year-long postponement. In the event you learn Trump’s assertion on the IMO, it turns into clear, getting an bold deal in 12 months’ time shall be very, very exhausting.

Trump isn’t the primary US president to torpedo worldwide offers. Bush did the identical. Even Obama sabotaged European local weather management, forcing it to desert components of its aviation carbon market, after which cooking up the unimplementable, ineffective CORSIA offsetting scheme on the UN aviation physique (ICAO) in 2016.

However make no mistake, what occurred on the IMO was completely different. Trump’s administration doesn’t need weaker local weather ambition, it desires to destroy clear vitality and local weather motion. And it’ll use the USA’s formidable energy to realize this purpose. The earlier we totally settle for the implications of this, the higher.

First, too many Europeans nonetheless assume making concessions to Trump is an efficient technique (not simply on local weather, sadly). Because the ‘negotiations’ reached a crescendo, proposals to desert and postpone got here from all angles. Some EU states steered sacrificing the EU’s personal transport local weather guidelines to appease him. Trump and his Gulf State allies killed the deal anyway, however they may keep in mind what Europe was prepared to sacrifice.

Second, what occurred in London was fully predictable. Did Europe actually assume they might go a world local weather deal, (wrongly) dubbed the primary world carbon tax, with out an enormous battle? The actual battle was waging outdoors the IMO partitions the place the US Secretary of State was making cellphone calls. Europe and its allies weren’t combating again at that stage. If Europe isn’t prepared to noticeably face off with Trump, it may possibly neglect about world offers.

Third, let’s face it, the IMO deal was not nice. It might have created an enormous new marketplace for crop-based biofuels like palm oil and soybean oil at a time when the world’s rainforests are at breaking level. It might have expanded LNG in transport and would have carried out little or no to spice up genuinely clear transport applied sciences. It is a characteristic, not a bug, of makes an attempt to control globally (CORSIA being the prime instance). So we will hold looking for a compromise that can swimsuit Trump and Saudi Arabia, or we will attempt one thing completely different.

A brand new method to world local weather offers

Many individuals say the Paris Settlement is the crowning achievement of local weather multilateralism. I agree. Nevertheless, Paris was solely attainable AFTER the humiliation of the Copenhagen COP, the place Europe deserted its ambition to have a ‘globally binding’ rule. Certainly, because the Paris Settlement, international locations themselves resolve their very own stage of emissions reductions via so-called nationally decided contributions.

The EU Fee has made carbon pricing a key pillar of its world local weather and vitality imaginative and prescient (that is primarily about CBAM). Why not prolong that logic to transport and aviation? Nations just like the UK can construct their very own techniques to match this and value emissions from these polluting sectors. This might be expanded to Türkiye, Africa (Djibutti and Gabon have already put an analogous system in place since 2023), Latin America, Canada and Asia. The US doesn’t have to participate.

The IMO might have failed as soon as extra, however that doesn’t imply worldwide local weather motion is doomed. Europe can and should paved the way. However provided that it accepts the implications of what occurred in London. Meaning, no extra concessions to Trump and the petrostates, a way more sturdy diplomatic posture and an acceptance that worldwide local weather motion would require a brand new method.

Nations like Chile and Namibia who voted in favour of the IMO deal have loads to realize from an e-fuels future powered by renewable vitality and are considerably investing in home-grown e-fuels. There’s nothing to cease progressive states from working collectively to deploy the renewable fuels via, for instance, inexperienced transport corridors. These are the international locations that can profit from the economic system of tomorrow, not the geopolitical video games of yesterday.

Article from T&E.