ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Join The Large Story e-newsletter to obtain tales like this one in your inbox.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott doesn’t need to disclose months of communications with Elon Musk or representatives from the tech mogul’s firms, arguing partially that they’re of a personal nature, not of public curiosity and probably embarrassing.
Musk had an eventful legislative session in Texas this yr. Along with his lobbyists efficiently advocating for a number of new legal guidelines, Abbott cited the Tesla and SpaceX CEO because the inspiration for the state creating its personal effectivity workplace and has praised him for transferring the headquarters for a lot of of his companies to the state in recent times.
As a part of an effort to monitor the billionaire’s affect within the state Capitol, The Texas Newsroom in April requested Abbott and his employees’s emails since final fall with Musk and different individuals who have an e-mail tackle related to a few of his firms.
Initially, the governor’s workplace mentioned it might take greater than 13 hours to overview the information. It supplied a price estimate of $244.64 for the work and required full cost up entrance. The Texas Newsroom agreed and lower a verify.
After the verify was cashed, the governor’s workplace advised The Texas Newsroom it believed all the information have been confidential and requested Texas Legal professional Common Ken Paxton, whose workplace referees disputes over public information, to permit the paperwork to be saved non-public.
Matthew Taylor, Abbott’s public info coordinator, gave a number of causes the information shouldn’t be launched. He argued they embrace non-public exchanges with legal professionals, particulars about policy-making selections and data that will reveal how the state entices firms to speculate right here. Releasing them to the general public, he wrote, “would have a chilling impact on the frank and open dialogue needed for the decision-making course of.”
Taylor additionally argued that the communications are confidential beneath an exception to public information legal guidelines often called “common-law privateness” as a result of they encompass “info that’s intimate and embarrassing and never of reputable concern to the general public, together with monetary selections that don’t relate to transactions between a person and a governmental physique.”
He didn’t present additional particulars in regards to the precise content material of the information.
The language Abbott’s workplace used seems to be pretty boilerplate. Paxton’s workplace, in a proof of the common-law privateness exception on its web site, mentions that “private monetary info” that doesn’t take care of authorities transactions “is mostly extremely intimate or embarrassing and have to be withheld.”
However Invoice Aleshire, a Texas-based lawyer specializing in public information regulation, was appalled that the governor is claiming that months of emails between his workplace and one of many world’s richest individuals are all non-public.
“Proper now, it seems they’ve charged you $244 for information they haven’t any intention of providing you with,” Aleshire mentioned. “That’s stunning.”
Aleshire mentioned it’s commonplace for presidency companies to faucet the common-law privateness exception in an try to withhold information from the general public. However he’s used to it being cited in circumstances that contain kids, medical information or different extremely private info — not for emails between an elected official and a businessman.
“You’re boxing at nighttime,” Aleshire mentioned. “You possibly can’t even see what the goal is or what’s behind their declare.”
Aleshire added that attributable to a latest Texas Supreme Courtroom ruling, there may be successfully no solution to implement public information legal guidelines in opposition to Abbott and different prime state officers. He referred to as the choice an “ace card” for these politicians.
The case handled requests to launch Abbott and Paxton’s communications within the wake of the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol and the 2022 college capturing in Uvalde. The excessive courtroom dominated that it’s the solely physique that may overview whether or not these officers are in compliance with public information legal guidelines.
Kevin Bagnall, a lawyer representing Musk’s rocket firm SpaceX, additionally wrote a letter to Paxton’s workplace arguing the emails must be saved secret. He cited one foremost motive: They comprise “industrial info whose disclosure would trigger SpaceX substantial aggressive hurt.”
A lot of the remainder of Bagnall’s letter, which additional defined SpaceX’s argument, was redacted.
Musk and representatives for his firms didn’t reply to requests for remark for this story.
Abbott’s spokesperson didn’t reply to particular questions in regards to the information, together with whether or not The Texas Newsroom can be refunded if Paxton withholds them.
In an announcement, he mentioned, “The Workplace of the Governor rigorously complies with the Texas Public Data Act and can launch any responsive info that’s decided to not be confidential or excepted from disclosure.”
The workplace of the lawyer common has 45 enterprise days to find out whether or not to launch Abbott’s information.
