Singapore and Sweden Strengthen Power Partnership at SIEW 2025

Help CleanTechnica’s work by a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

SINGAPORE — The Power Market Authority of Singapore (EMA) and the Swedish authorities inaugurated a bilateral power discussion board on the sidelines of the 18th Singapore Worldwide Power Week, reworking a diplomatic understanding signed throughout a royal state go to into an operational framework for clear power cooperation.

Strategic context

The Singapore Worldwide Power Week is Asia’s preeminent venue for power coverage dialogue, drawing regulators, utilities, and expertise suppliers to deal with the area’s power safety challenges amid accelerating decarbonization commitments.

This 12 months’s version coincided with mounting strain on Southeast Asian nations to reconcile industrial development trajectories with local weather obligations, whereas European states deal with power safety imperatives following years of geopolitical disruption.

The EMA operates on the intersection of those tensions.

In an off-the-cuff chat with EMA Chief Govt Push Kok Keong, CleanTechnica requested in regards to the quickly altering power setting in Asia and the fast tempo of power applied sciences being developed, and the way Singapore generally is a world instance of decarbonization and on the identical time power utilization.

“As regulator of a city-state fully depending on imported power—primarily pure fuel and petroleum merchandise—EMA’s mandate extends past typical market oversight to embody the orchestration of Singapore’s power transition technique,” he responded. He then identified that utilization solely means collaboration–this contains pursuing regional grid interconnection, creating nascent hydrogen provide chains, and positioning Singapore as a clear power buying and selling hub inside ASEAN’s fragmented power panorama.

From protocol to observe

The discussion board materialized an power cooperation memorandum with Sweden, signed final November 2024 throughout King Carl XVI Gustaf’s state go to—a diplomatic gesture that has since generated substantive technical exchanges on clear power deployment and cross-border infrastructure.

The October 29 gathering assembled senior officers to look at particular mechanisms for collaboration, transferring past the aspirational language attribute of bilateral power agreements towards concrete technical cooperation. The discussions encompassed hydrogen worth chain improvement, superior grid applied sciences, power effectivity optimization, and the structure of cross-border electrical energy buying and selling—domains the place each nations possess complementary capabilities and strategic imperatives.

Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and Swedish Deputy Prime Minister Ebba Busch, who additionally holds the power and business portfolios, addressed the discussion board’s strategic significance.

“This Discussion board builds on the sturdy and longstanding ties between Sweden and Singapore. Sweden’s power and industrial coverage combines competitiveness with local weather ambition, specializing in sensible options that advance innovation, digitalisation, and fashionable nuclear applied sciences. By working carefully with companions in Asia, we will strengthen power safety, help a secure world baseload, and speed up the inexperienced transition towards a sustainable power future,” Busch articulated, explaining the partnership’s underlying logic in a press assertion.

Technical structure

Central to the partnership is the deployment of HVDC (Excessive Voltage Direct Present) transmission expertise and related infrastructure—overland cables and subsea interconnectors—that will combine into the ASEAN Energy Grid structure. HVDC techniques allow environment friendly long-distance electrical energy transmission with decrease losses than typical alternating present techniques, a essential consideration for submarine cables spanning a whole lot of kilometers between nationwide grids.

The cooperation framework extends to nuclear expertise and security protocols, reflecting Sweden’s a long time of operational expertise with its reactor fleet and Singapore’s ongoing evaluation of small modular reactors as a possible baseload complement to intermittent renewables. Each governments indicated plans to deepen engagement by SIEW and different multilateral boards, whereas establishing bilateral channels for data switch on clear gasoline pathways, together with hydrogen and ammonia as maritime gasoline options and power carriers.

The multidirectional electrical energy buying and selling part addresses a elementary problem in Southeast Asian power integration: the absence of strong cross-border buying and selling mechanisms that will allow surplus renewable era in a single jurisdiction to offset fossil gasoline consumption in one other, thereby strengthening collective power resilience whereas advancing decarbonization.

Institutional Views

Keong framed the collaboration inside Singapore’s broader regional power technique: “EMA welcomes the deepening of collaboration and high-level exchanges between Singapore and Sweden by this Discussion board. This partnership strengthens regional power resilience and helps our shared imaginative and prescient of a sustainable power future.”

The Singapore–Sweden partnership represents a calculated alignment of pursuits between a European state with mature renewable power infrastructure and nuclear experience, and a Southeast Asian city-state positioned to function a regional power aggregator and buying and selling nexus. Sweden brings operational data of built-in renewable techniques, nuclear energy, and industrial decarbonization; Singapore provides entry to quickly rising Southeast Asian power markets, established buying and selling infrastructure, and convening energy inside ASEAN power dialogues.

Whether or not this framework yields tangible outcomes relies on navigating formidable technical and monetary obstacles. HVDC interconnection requires multi-billion-dollar capital commitments, advanced multilateral negotiations involving transit international locations, and backbone of regulatory asymmetries throughout jurisdictions with divergent power market constructions. Hydrogen infrastructure improvement faces related hurdles, compounded by persistent financial uncompetitiveness relative to incumbent fuels absent substantial coverage help or carbon pricing mechanisms.

The discussion board’s success will in the end be measured not by diplomatic communiqués however by mission finance commitments, grid connection agreements, and operational hydrogen provide chains—benchmarks that usually emerge years after preliminary coverage dialogues, in the event that they materialize in any respect.