People, business teams, and native governments submitted over 10,000 feedback to the White Home about its work-in-progress nationwide AI coverage, also called the AI Motion Plan. The White Home Workplace of Science and Know-how Coverage (OSTP) on Thursday printed the textual content of the submissions in a PDF spanning 18,480 pages.
The feedback, which contact on subjects starting from copyright to the environmental harms of AI information facilities, come as President Donald Trump and allies rejigger the U.S. authorities’s AI priorities.
In January, President Trump repealed former President Joe Biden’s AI Government Order, which had instructed the Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Know-how to creator steering that helps corporations establish — and proper for — flaws in fashions, together with biases. Critics allied with Trump argued that the order’s reporting necessities have been onerous and successfully pressured corporations to reveal their commerce secrets and techniques.
Shortly after revoking the AI Government Order, Trump signed an order directing federal companies to advertise the event of AI “free from ideological bias” that promotes “human flourishing, financial competitiveness, and nationwide safety.” Importantly, Trump’s order made no point out of combating AI discrimination, which was a key tenet of Biden’s initiative.
Feedback submitted to the White Home clarify what’s at stake within the AI race.
Plenty of commenters asserted that AI is exploitative, in a phrase, educated on the works of creatives who aren’t compensated for his or her involuntary contributions, and petitioned the Trump administration to strengthen copyright regulation. On the opposing aspect, commenters akin to VC agency Andreessen Horowitz accused rightsholders of placing up roadblocks to AI improvement.
A number of AI corporations, together with Google and OpenAI, have additionally pushed for friendlier guidelines round AI coaching in earlier feedback on the AI Motion Plan.
Petitions from organizations together with Individuals for Prosperity, The Way forward for Life Institute, and the American Academy of Nursing emphasised the significance of investments in analysis at a time when the federal authorities is slashing scientific grants. AI consultants have criticized the Trump administration’s latest cuts to scientific grant-making, and specifically, reductions championed by billionaire Elon Musk’s Division of Authorities Effectivity.
Some commenters on the AI Motion Plan took intention on the Trump administration’s far-ranging tariffs on overseas items, suggesting that they could hurt home AI efforts. The Knowledge Middle Coalition, a commerce affiliation representing the information middle sector, says tariffs on infrastructure elements “will restrict and sluggish” U.S. AI investments. Elsewhere, the Info Know-how Trade Council, an advocacy group whose members embody Amazon, Intel, and Microsoft, urged “good” tariffs that “shield home industries with out escalating commerce wars that hurt customers.”
Solely a handful of feedback talked about “AI censorship,” a subject prime of thoughts for a lot of of Trump’s shut confidants. Elon Musk and crypto and AI “czar” David Sacks have alleged that common chatbots censor conservative viewpoints, with Sacks singling out ChatGPT specifically as untruthful about politically delicate topics.
In reality, bias in AI is an intractable technical drawback. Musk’s AI firm, xAI, has itself struggled to create a chatbot that doesn’t endorse some political opinions over others.
President Trump has ramped up efforts to assemble an AI coverage staff in latest months.
In March, the Senate confirmed Trump’s choose for director of the OSTP, Michael Kratsios, who targeted on AI coverage within the OSTP throughout Trump’s first time period. Towards the top of final yr, Trump named former VC Sriram Krishnan because the White Home’s senior coverage advisor for AI.
