Musk Pay Package deal Proposal Promotes Highly effective Push Again

Assist CleanTechnica’s work by way of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

Loads of information comes into the CleanTechnica communications heart within the third sub-basement of our world headquarters, the place the teletype machines clatter night time and day to maintain up with the most recent developments on this planet of fresh vitality, electrical autos, and the rest that entails the hunt to maintain people from turning the Earth right into a cauldron of dying for our species.

A couple of days in the past, Zachary Shahan shared an electronic mail with me that introduced knowledgeable funding advisory group was recommending that Tesla shareholders reject the most recent proposal by the Tesla board that might reward Elon Musk with emollients valued at practically one trillion {dollars} if he achieved sure milestones within the years to return.

On the time, I advised Zachary I wasn’t all that thinking about doing the story, as institutional buyers previously had suggested towards munificent pay packages for the usually erratic Elon and had been soundly overruled by shareholders. There appeared little motive to consider they might not achieve this once more.

However there was one twist within the story because the electronic mail was obtained. Within the wee hours of the morning on Sunday, October 19, 2025, Musk posted on his private delinquent media platform, “Tesla is value greater than all different automotive firms mixed. Which of these CEOs would you prefer to run Tesla? It received’t be me.”

It doesn’t take a mind surgeon to determine that Musk has simply put everybody on discover that until he will get his means, he’s going to take his ball and go house. I depart it as much as readers to determine if it is a smart enterprise transfer or a mood tantrum by a petulant man-child. Clearly, Musk ought to have a kind of bumper stickers on the again of his private car that claims, “Does Not Play Nicely With Others.”

ISS Opposes Musk Pay Plan

All of it started on October 17, when CNBC reported that Institutional Shareholder Companies was recommending that Tesla buyers vote towards the Giga Pay Package deal for Musk, saying it “has an astronomical grant worth conditioned upon far-reaching efficiency targets that, if achieved, would create huge worth for shareholders.” It stated that whereas some shareholders might help the pay plan, “there are unmitigated considerations surrounding the particular award’s magnitude and design.”

In an delinquent media put up, Tesla accused ISS of lacking “basic factors of investing and governance,” and complained that the advisors had beforehand “advisable towards compensation that shareholders have voted on twice earlier than (and that Elon has already earned), in addition to the 2025 CEO Efficiency Award.”

After the ISS announcement, a second skilled investor advisory service additionally urged shareholders to reject the deal. In accordance with Enterprise Insider, Glass Lewis & Co. advised shoppers the award “warrants important shareholder concern.” That was greater than a press launch. The Glass Lewis assertion was 90 pages lengthy and known as the proposed pay bundle “excessively dilutive.” It estimated that, if absolutely exercised, it may lower present shareholders’ possession by about 11.3 p.c.

Glass Lewis valued the deal at $141.6 billion — way over Tesla’s personal $87.8 billion estimate — and stated Musk may reap “billions in compensation and a materially elevated possession stake” even when he hits simply one of many 12 efficiency tranches. “The potential upfront and future dilutive impacts to shareholders, in addition to extraordinary pay ranges with out commensurately distinctive efficiency by way of the achievement of even just some tranches, warrant important concern,” Glass Lewis wrote.

The report additionally raised pink flags about Tesla’s board independence and oversight of Musk’s pay, saying Musk’s compensation is being reviewed by a board that has lengthy confronted questions on its closeness to the CEO, citing administrators with private or skilled ties to him that date again years. The agency stated that dynamic was central to a Delaware courtroom ruling earlier this yr that struck down Musk’s 2018 pay bundle, discovering that these relationships compromised the approval course of. These considerations stay related, Glass Lewis added.

It questioned whether or not the proposed pay bundle went far sufficient to make sure Musk’s focus stays on Tesla, given his slate of different ventures, together with SpaceX, xAI, X, and Neuralink. “The scale of the award may end result within the state of affairs the place Mr. E. Musk receives billions in compensation and a materially elevated possession stake,” the agency stated, “even when solely a single tranche is earned.”

Glass Lewis warned the early milestones “don’t seem as Herculean as the scale of the proposed tranches would counsel,” implying Musk may unlock large worth with out delivering the form of outlier efficiency the bundle purports to demand.

Tesla Calls Warnings “Misguided”

Tesla pushed again vigorously on Musk’s private delinquent media channel on October 20, saying each ISS and Glass Lewis had been “misguided,” and noting they’ve “advisable towards Tesla’s proposals time and time once more because the 2018 CEO Efficiency Award was launched. It’s factor our shareholders ignored these suggestions, in any other case they could have missed out on our market capitalization hovering by 20x from March 2018 to August 2025.”

The corporate accused the advisors of utilizing “one-size-fits-all checklists” that “undermine shareholders’ pursuits,” and added their suggestions “try to override the mandate our shareholders delivered to Elon and ignore the staggering monetary outcomes delivered below Elon’s management.”

Over the weekend, Cathie Wooden, whose ARK Investments was an early investor in Tesla, defended Musk and the Tesla board, saying ISS and Glass Lewis had been those with the issue. In accordance with Fortune, on Sunday, Wooden additionally took to delinquent media to say it was “unhappy if not damning” that proxy advisory agency have a lot affect. She was particularly essential of the connection between proxy companies and index funds, claiming they’ve an outsized affect over voting due to the massive variety of shares they management for his or her buyers.

“Index funds do no basic analysis, but dominate institutional voting. Index-based investing is a type of socialism. Our funding system is damaged,” she thundered. Fortune pushed again on her assertions, saying that their mother or father firms completely do their due diligence.

“The three largest index funds on this planet are managed by Vanguard, State Road, and BlackRock, and all three do in depth analysis for proxy voting choices and have their very own proxy voting tips that they publish. Additionally, these three funds maintain over $2 trillion monitoring the S&P 500 index and characterize the overwhelming majority of retail merchants invested within the inventory market. Whereas index funds don’t do analysis to select shares, they make the most of their analysis base for voting choices.”

In one other collection of posts, Wooden claimed ISS and Glass Lewis don’t see the potential in Tesla that ARK Make investments does and seemingly urged index funds needs to be stripped of their voting energy. “I consider that historical past will determine that Glass Lewis and ISS have been menaces to innovation, enabling passive buyers who care about ‘monitoring errors’ to their indexes however don’t care about a lot else,” Wooden wrote.

Russell Rhoads, an affiliate professor of economic administration at Indiana College, advised Fortune that whereas buyers in an energetic fund know its administration might push for adjustments to an organization whether it is struggling, the identical isn’t true for passive buyers who put their cash into index funds. “Basically, if I put cash right into a fund, that’s presupposed to mirror the index, that may be a passive funding,” he stated. “I’m simply investing out there and never attempting to affect something, what some other firms are doing enterprise smart.”

Energy & Management

InsideEVs contributor Rob Stumpf put issues fairly succinctly when he stated, “Translated from Muskspeak, it roughly implies that he doesn’t wish to be advised what to do, or what to say, and desires to have sufficient voting energy to make sure that stays unchallenged. In the meantime, buyers are in a lose-lose state of affairs. Both approve Musk’s trillion-dollar golden leash or threat his efforts being utilized elsewhere. And when a lot of Tesla’s valuation is perceived to be tied to the CEO, the latter could possibly be catastrophic to the corporate’s worth.”

The Tesla annual assembly is scheduled to happen on November 5, 2025. If previous historical past is any information, the pay bundle for Musk will probably be endorsed enthusiastically by the vast majority of Tesla shareholders and Musk will probably be ebullient, proclaiming wondrous issues forward for the corporate.

We at CleanTechnica have grown weary of Musk’s antics, charades, political stunts, and spittle infused tantrums. This colossal pay bundle appears outrageous to us, coming from a captive board which might be actually little greater than co-conspirators in Musk’s ongoing Ponzi scheme. Maybe we’re simply jealous as a result of nobody is providing us a trillion {dollars} to struggle for reality, justice, and the EV revolution.

Put it right down to bitter grapes, if you’ll, however we predict this pay bundle is wrong-headed and akin to pouring gasoline on the bonfire that’s Musk’s ego. Whereas having private robots in our properties making the mattress and doing the laundry is all very interesting, we query whether or not promoting 27 variations of the Mannequin Y is actually the work of a genius or just the results of placing somebody who is aware of subsequent to nothing in regards to the automobile enterprise in control of an car manufacturing firm.

Seize your popcorn on November 5. The Tesla annual assembly guarantees to be fairly a present.