Assist CleanTechnica’s work by way of a Substack subscription or on Stripe.
Final Up to date on: twenty ninth August 2025, 11:23 am
Technical feasibility is now not the first barrier for mass timber building. Engineers and builders have confirmed that tall, robust, and protected constructions might be delivered with cross-laminated timber and associated merchandise. The actual bottlenecks now lie in insurance coverage premiums and constructing code adoption. Insurers worth threat, and with out lengthy information histories they assume the worst. Regulators subject permits, and with out constant code adoption throughout provinces and municipalities, initiatives face delays and further prices.
For mass timber to scale into the mainstream, it must cease being handled as novel and as an alternative be handled as atypical. In different phrases, it must grow to be boring. When it’s seen as boring by insurers and regulators, premiums fall to parity with concrete and metal, permits are issued shortly, and the benefits of velocity and carbon efficiency might be realized.
The sequence up to now has constructed a transparent case for mass timber as Canada’s quickest lever to handle housing, economic system, and local weather collectively. The opening article argued that cross-laminated timber (CLT) and modular building can double housing provide whereas chopping embodied carbon. The second examined Mark Carney’s Construct Canada Houses initiative and confirmed how authorities can act as an anchor purchaser to show coverage into actual housing output. The third mapped out Canada’s mass-timber playbook, stressing the necessity for an built-in worth chain from sawmills to modules. The fourth explored how CLT substitution bends long-term cement and metal demand curves, making heavy business decarbonization extra achievable. The fifth handled the carbon sequestration bona fides of CLT. The sixth handled decarbonizing the CLT provide chain together with sustainable forestry.
Insurers are conservative for good motive. They depend on actuarial information to set premiums, and the place that information is scarce they apply multipliers. For mass timber right this moment, builder’s threat insurance coverage is commonly 4 to 10 occasions increased than for comparable concrete initiatives. That distinction erodes the monetary case for builders even when building prices and schedules look favorable. Underwriters fear about hearth threat throughout the building part, when sprinklers aren’t but operational and encapsulation might not but be in place. Additionally they fear about water injury from sprinklers or leaks, believing that timber could also be more durable to remediate. With out a long time of claims information, they assume these dangers will end in increased losses. Consequently, many builders discover that the venture professional forma can’t take up the insurance coverage premium, and initiatives that might be constructed don’t transfer ahead.
Codes have superior however stay inconsistent. The 2020 Nationwide Constructing Code of Canada permits for twelve-story encapsulated mass timber constructions. Provinces are slowly adopting these provisions, however erratically. Some municipalities proceed to require initiatives to undergo another options pathway, the place engineers should current detailed justification and regulators should overview case by case.
That undermines one of many chief benefits of modular CLT housing, which is repeatability and velocity. With out constant prescriptive codes, initiatives face delays and uncertainty. Builders and manufacturing facility operators can’t depend on designs being permitted shortly throughout a number of jurisdictions, and that slows the enterprise case for investing in giant scale mass timber factories.
The answer is to normalize mass timber with information, prescriptive requirements, and interim measures that reduce perceived threat. A nationwide information belief that collects info from each mass timber venture would assist insurers worth threat extra precisely. If claims information, hearth check outcomes, and efficiency monitoring are aggregated, insurers can change assumptions with proof. Authorities also can help pooled builder’s threat pilots, the place a number of initiatives share protection. This spreads the danger, reduces publicity for particular person underwriters, and accelerates the gathering of claims information. Over time, with dozens or a whole lot of initiatives logged, premiums will fall towards parity with standard supplies.
Certification reciprocity is one other coverage lever. CSA A277 supplies a path for manufacturing facility constructed modules to be licensed to code requirements, however acceptance is just not automated throughout provinces. If a module is licensed in Ontario, a province like British Columbia should still require further overview. A nationwide settlement on reciprocity would cut back duplication and velocity approvals. The present version of the Nationwide Constructing Code, in power as of January 1st, moved to eighteen-story mass timber provisions, and provinces ought to undertake the nationwide codes persistently. That may make tall timber routine and take away the uncertainty that drags down adoption.
There are sensible measures to handle insurer considerations throughout the riskiest part of building. Development part hearth requirements ought to grow to be necessary, together with necessities for non permanent encapsulation, on web site hearth watches, and actual time monitoring. These measures handle the danger that insurers fear about most. Inspector and official coaching can be important. If native constructing officers are unfamiliar with mass timber, they could apply inconsistent requirements or delay approvals. Coaching applications at scale can be certain that inspectors are assured and constant, which improves each security and predictability.
Charts could make the trajectory seen. A premium multiplier pattern line may present builder’s threat insurance coverage beginning at 4 to 10 occasions increased than concrete in 2023 and transferring steadily towards parity by 2030 as information accumulates. A code adoption map may present provinces which have moved to twelve- or eighteen-story mass timber provisions and people nonetheless lagging. Collectively, these visuals assist stakeholders see each the progress and the gaps. Additionally they present what might be achieved with coordinated motion.
The dangers to this path are actual. A serious hearth occasion throughout building may harden attitudes and stall adoption. Insurers are gradual to vary even with information. Provinces can delay code adoption. However the enablers are additionally robust. Federal and provincial housing targets create stress to take away bottlenecks. Insurers are already exploring pooled threat fashions and specialised merchandise. European and American precedents present that normalization is feasible. Canada has each motive to maneuver shortly to make mass timber boring within the eyes of insurers and regulators.
The conclusion is that scaling mass timber is just not about making it thrilling however about making it routine. Normalization is the pathway to decrease premiums, sooner permits, and wider adoption. When insurers see mass timber initiatives as simply one other constructing sort, and when regulators subject permits as readily as for concrete, the business will attain the tipping level. The objective is to make CLT and modular housing as unremarkable to insurers and inspectors as concrete and rebar. That’s when the actual benefits of price, velocity, and carbon efficiency will probably be unlocked at scale.
Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive degree summaries, join our day by day e-newsletter, and comply with us on Google Information!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us right here.
Join our day by day e-newsletter for 15 new cleantech tales a day. Or join our weekly one on prime tales of the week if day by day is just too frequent.
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.
CleanTechnica’s Remark Coverage
