J.Okay. Rowling’s supporters regularly declare the creator has by no means truly stated or achieved something transphobic. It’s a place you possibly can see on social media, within the pages of the New York Occasions, and even on a 2023 podcast with Rowling herself.
It’s additionally an simply debunked lie.
A few of this confusion round Rowling’s opinions could be cleared up with a definition of transphobia, which doesn’t — regardless of the “phobia” — solely imply worry of trans folks, however, per Merriam-Webster, additionally an “irrational worry of, aversion to, or discrimination towards transgender folks.” (In truth, Merriam-Webster’s personal examples record cites a number of articles associated to Rowling.) Rowling can say she likes everybody, however she has displayed that prejudice again and again. She’s additionally peddled express worry of trans folks, significantly trans girls, insisting they’re an inherently harmful menace to cisgender girls.
Though some in the media distort the anger directed at Rowling from trans activists, trans folks, and allies, the reality is these emotions — not simply anger, however betrayal and grief — are justified. Rowling has made her antagonistic place on trans points clear by tweets, sound bites, actions, and even a 3,600-word weblog put up. By 2025, her transphobia has turn out to be so rampant and fixed that it’s tough to construct a very complete timeline of it. For these attuned to it, she doesn’t must spell it out each single time; it’s an enormous a part of her identification.
These canine whistles solely result in extra confusion, permitting folks to level to the absence of instantly apparent bigotry to say she’s being unfairly maligned. Over time, nonetheless, that bigotry has not solely grown extra pronounced but in addition broader in scope, main her to lately goal not solely trans folks but in addition asexual folks. Moreover, she more and more threatens detractors with authorized motion, which contributes to critics of her conduct falling silent. Conspicuously, lots of her authorized threats look like directed at people figuring out as a part of the LGBTQ+ group.
Since Rowling started airing her views, her group, particularly on-line the place many of those conversations are had, is now stacked with equally minded individuals who share her transphobic beliefs. As an example, Rowling is associates with quite a few anti-trans activists, together with Helen Joyce, who’s made alarmingly transphobic statements calling for a “discount” within the variety of trans folks. She’s tweeted public help for anti-gay, anti-trans activist Caroline Farrow. These connections are a part of a social community echo chamber of trans-exclusionary radical feminists, or TERFs (typically referred to as “radfems” or the “gender-critical” motion). In Rowling’s native UK, TERFism has gained a singular stronghold over some significantly vocal, ostensibly liberal feminists like Rowling. Her strident transphobia has additionally led her to align herself with far-right extremists.
The info we are able to simply level to recommend that Rowling has been turning towards an anti-trans stance over a protracted interval, starting principally with easy engagement on social media and resulting in fiery and extremist statements. Whereas labeling one thing transphobic is a severe accusation, and never one thing we do evenly, it’s essential to acknowledge Rowling’s bigotry for what it’s. The rundown that follows reveals her rising embrace of transphobic, even extremist rhetoric.
2014: Rowling writes The Silkworm, the second novel within the Cormoran Strike thriller sequence, which includes a trans lady who’s portrayed as conspicuous and unable to cross. The ebook features a scene the place the principle character gleefully threatens this character with jail rape.
October 2017: Rowling “likes” a tweet linking to a controversial, since-deleted Medium article referring to a theoretical trans lady in a feminine area as “a stranger with a penis.” Whereas liking a tweet might sound small, that is notable as a result of the piece made the essential argument Rowling continues to make right this moment, specifically that trans girls are by default a part of a “male-bodied” group who’re harmful to girls and who mustn’t have entry to girls’s bogs. Within the public sphere, this kicks off questions on whether or not Rowling is anti-trans, that are adopted by the creator entrenching additional.
2018: In March, Rowling “likes” (after which unlikes) a tweet referring to trans girls as “males in clothes” and implying that trans rights are “misogyny.” A JKR spokesperson later claims that this “like” was an accident and that Rowling was having “a middle-aged second.”
In September, Rowling “likes” a tweet linking to an opinion column by identified TERF Janice Turner, which argues but once more that trans girls are inherently sexual predators, referring to them as “fox[es] in a henhouse … determine[ing] as [hens].” The parable that trans girls are a hazard to cis girls is a grossly transphobic stereotype with nearly no real-world justification, however Rowling pins most of her anti-trans arguments on it, utilizing her expertise as a survivor of home abuse to justify her prejudice.
December 2019: In a shift towards brazenly voicing her anti-trans sentiments, Rowling vocally helps the plaintiff of an employment discrimination swimsuit within the UK. Maya Forstater grew to become a trigger célèbre within the TERF group after suing the corporate that selected to not renew her contract. In 2018, Forstater posted quite a few anti-trans tweets, each generalizing about trans folks and immediately concentrating on one nonbinary individual. The tweets made employees members at her firm uncomfortable, and finally, in March 2019, the group declined to resume Forstater’s contract. Rowling’s tweet, during which she distorts trans identification and the info of the case, marks the primary time many individuals turn out to be conscious of her rising transphobic tendencies.
June 2020: In a tweet, Rowling mocks the trans-inclusive phrase “individuals who menstruate” in an article about pandemic menstrual well being, implying that the phrase, meant to embody trans males and nonbinary folks, erases, overrides, or obscures the phrase “girls.”
In a follow-up to the earlier tweet and the backlash it spawned, Rowling posts a thread implying that trans activists are “erasing the idea of [biological] intercourse” and together with it “the lived actuality of ladies.” She additionally states, “I’d march with you in case you had been discriminated towards on the premise of being trans.” (Thus far, she has not.)
Days later, Rowling produces her most overt and prolonged dialogue of her views, a 3,600-word manifesto printed on her web site responding to “the brand new trans activism.” The put up is replete with myths and false transphobic stereotypes, significantly revolving across the narratives that gender and biology are inextricable and that trans girls are harmful. Rowling states the motion affords “cowl to predators”. She additionally repeatedly amplifies the alarmist, false concept that teenagers are transitioning as a part of a social media pattern, a declare based mostly on a handful of inaccurate and shady scientific research claiming that an outsize variety of trans teenagers will detransition later, research which have since been broadly debunked.
August 2020: After the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights group points a press release repudiating her transphobia, Rowling doubles down on her place and returns an award given to her by the org in 2019.
September 2020: Rowling releases the Cormoran Strike ebook Troubled Blood and is broadly criticized after she creates a villain who preys on girls by sporting girls’s garments. That is precisely the specter of a sexual predator that Rowling believes hides behind the label of “trans lady.”
December 2020: In an interview with Good Housekeeping, Rowling claims that “90 p.c” of Harry Potter followers secretly agree together with her anti-trans views, however that “many are afraid to talk up as a result of they worry for his or her jobs and even for his or her private security.” This as soon as once more stereotypes trans activists as an offended, entitled, and cruel mob.
July 2021: Rowling tweets a screenshot of a tiny account — reportedly with round 200 followers on the time — of a self-identified trans person who mentions her in a tweet discussing gender identification. Since Rowling didn’t take away the trans person’s data within the screenshot that went out to her 14 million followers, that person is subsequently inundated with transphobic harassment and finally deletes their Twitter account.
November 2021: Rowling publicizes {that a} group of three trans folks shared a photograph of themselves holding protest indicators outdoors of her home, saying that she had referred to as the police out of alarm (a truth Scottish police additionally verified). Rowling claims that these protesters had “doxxed” her, and the media runs with this report, which performs into the bigger evolving media narrative of Rowling as a sufferer of trans harassment. However as many individuals have identified, Rowling’s handle is publicly identified — so well-known, the truth is, that it’s a frequent fan tour cease. Police later formally state there’s “no criminality” in what the trans protesters had achieved.
As trans tradition vlogger Jessie Earl factors out, trans folks themselves are at a lot greater threat of experiencing doxxing, bullying, and harassment than cisgender folks. Earl additionally notes that Rowling has supported and platformed (by Twitter likes, follows, and retweets) a number of TERFs who had themselves doxxed different folks, together with Marion Millar, who confronted legal prices for homophobically doxxing a police officer (although these prices had been dropped pending evaluation); Rosie Duffield, an MP who drew criticism for “publicly outing” a employees member who resigned over her transphobia; and Rosa Freedman, a professor who doxxed a pupil who emailed her requesting a chat about her views on trans equality.
“Warfare is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Power. The Penised Particular person Who Raped You Is a Girl.”
December 2021: Rowling shares a Sunday Occasions article that mocks the Scottish police for recognizing transgender identification. In her tweet, she parodies 1984, writing, “Warfare is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Power. The Penised Particular person Who Raped You Is a Girl.”
Later that month, in the midst of a thread ostensibly making an attempt to help trans equality, Rowling tweets, “The query on the coronary heart of this debate is whether or not intercourse or gender identification ought to type the premise of choices on safeguarding, provision of companies, sporting classes and different areas the place girls and ladies at present have authorized rights and protections.” The thought behind what Rowling is saying is that permitting trans girls equal entry to these areas will erode present authorized rights for cisgender girls and ladies. It is a place that solely is sensible if you’re denying that trans girls and ladies are girls and ladies. Rowling then provides an insistence on separating “intercourse” from “gender,” an essentialist concept that contradicts present medical follow and scientific analysis, which advocates for treating gender identification as linked primarily to the mind, not anatomy.
March 2022: In response to a since-deleted tweet (which was itself a reply to a tweet during which Rowling implied trans girls had been “predators”), Rowling tweets about a sexual assault dedicated by a trans lady, utilizing this single incident to suggest that each one trans girls must be denied entry to public areas designated for ladies.
The subsequent day, on Worldwide Girls’s Day, Rowling posts a sequence of tweets maligning gender-inclusive language and mockingly referencing Voldemort by sarcastically opining that the day in future could be referred to as “She Who Should Not Be Named Day.” She additionally explicitly criticizes gender-inclusive laws.
Later that month, British lawyer Alison Bailey partially wins an employment discrimination lawsuit during which she claimed that she was discriminated towards due to her gender-essentialist views. Whereas the lawsuit was in progress, Rowling posted a tweet urging her followers to financially help Bailey.
August 2022: Rowling’s newest Cormoran Strike ebook, The Ink Black Coronary heart, as soon as once more comes underneath hearth for transphobia due to its depiction of a personality broadly viewable as a satirical stand-in for Rowling herself — an anti-trans public determine who’s “canceled” by the web on trumped-up prices of transphobia after which killed.
December 2022: Rowling screencaps a thread in regards to the controversial new Hogwarts Legacy online game by the aforementioned common transgender YouTuber Jessie Earl, aka Jessie Gender. Earl factors out that supporting the franchise would “justify her continued concentrating on of trans folks”; Rowling, in response, sarcastically accuses Earl of practising “purethink,” implying trans advocacy is a sort of non secular dogma. An onslaught of transphobic social media harassment concentrating on Earl follows.
This month, Rowling additionally personally funds a brand new home violence help heart in Edinburgh, Scotland, which explicitly excludes trans girls; Rowling frames this new heart as providing “women-centered and women-delivered care.” Edinburgh’s longstanding home violence help heart has had a trans lady as its director since 2021. Trans girls, particularly girls of coloration, are at a vastly greater threat of experiencing home violence and sexual assault than cisgender girls.
January 2023: Rowling posts that she is “Deeply amused by these telling me I’ve misplaced their admiration because of the disrespect I present violent, duplicitous rapists.” Essentially the most speedy context for this remark is presumably each the backlash to Hogwarts Legacy and the continued backlash over Rowling’s views writ giant relating to trans girls being harmful predators. So an affordable implication of Rowling’s phrases appears to be that she considers trans girls, by default, to be “violent, duplicitous rapists.”
March 2023: A new podcast, The Witch Trials of J.Okay. Rowling, produced by Bari Weiss’s the Free Press and hosted by outstanding former Westboro Baptist Church member Megan Phelps-Roper, featured interviews with Rowling. In its fifth episode, Rowling begins discussing the fashionable trans rights motion, calling it “a cultural motion that was intolerant in its strategies and questionable in its concepts” and insisting, “I consider, completely, that there’s something harmful about this motion and that it should be challenged.”
She then compares the motion to Loss of life Eaters — the villainous supremacists in her books, analogous to Nazis:
[S]ome of you haven’t understood the books. The Loss of life Eaters claimed, “We’ve got been made to reside in secret, and now could be our time, and any who stand in our means should be destroyed. For those who disagree with us, you need to die.” They demonized and dehumanized those that weren’t like them.
I’m preventing what I see as a robust, insidious, misogynistic motion, that has gained big buy in very influential areas of society. I don’t see this explicit motion as both benign or powerless, so I’m afraid I stand with the ladies who’re preventing to be heard towards threats of lack of livelihood and threats to their security.
Whereas Rowling can say she solely intends to focus on the precise trans activists who’re offended at her, that’s an inconceivable distinction. She doesn’t point out any formal group or entity that represents trans rights that has acted towards her. The one context now we have for what she is responding to are non-affiliated people on Twitter sending offended messages in response to her transphobic feedback. Certainly, the episode is titled “The Tweets” and options Phelps-Roper studying offended and unhappy tweets from former followers of Rowling. This generalization doesn’t distinguish “the motion” from people who find themselves merely offended and upset with Rowling. As an alternative, it appears to suggest that “good” trans persons are those who settle for Rowling’s model of their identification and permit her viewpoint — that they aren’t who they are saying they’re — to dominate their battle for social acceptance.
Trans persons are estimated to comprise about half a p.c of populations in each the US and the UK. A 2018 research from UCLA discovered no proof to help that anti-trans laws makes designated public areas safer, however did discover that “experiences of privateness and security violations in these locations are exceedingly uncommon.” In essence, there was no hazard to start with.
February 2024: Rowling donated 70,000 kilos (about $90,000) to an anti-trans Scottish political foyer campaigning to limit the Scottish authorities’s definition of “girls” to cisgender girls solely.
March 2024: On March 13, Rowling seems to disclaim on X (previously Twitter) that trans folks had been focused throughout the Holocaust. This all began when Rowling reposted a put up by James Esses about having been “canceled.” Esses is a blogger and former pupil who was fired from his counseling job and expelled from his remedy diploma program for his anti-trans campaigning.
Esses’s put up claimed he was fired for opposing the usage of puberty blockers for trans youngsters. Within the threads of Esses’s put up, in response to one in every of his supporters but in addition copying each Esses and Rowling, a person responded with, “The Nazis burnt books on trans healthcare and analysis, why are you so determined to uphold their ideology round gender?”
Rowling then takes this put up and screencaps it, asking, “I simply… how? How did you sort this out and press ship with out pondering ‘I ought to perhaps test my supply for this, as a result of it would’ve been a fever dream’?”
The literal burning by Nazis of books and analysis from Berlin’s pioneering Institute for Sexual Analysis, which performed the world’s first gender-affirming surgical procedures for trans folks, was captured in German newsreels on the time and has been well-documented since, together with by the UK’s personal Holocaust Memorial Day Belief. Calling this very well-sourced historical past a “fever dream” rapidly drew vital backlash from X customers, with many framing it as a type of Holocaust denial. When challenged on her declare with a number of sources by Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic teacher Alejandra Caraballo, Rowling first responds that the unique put up had made claims it didn’t say: that the Nazis burnt all analysis on trans well being care, and that trans folks had been the first victims of the Nazis.
Rowling then doubles down on X by quote tweeting one other tweet claiming trans folks weren’t targets of the Nazis throughout the Holocaust. In her quote, Rowling frames the verified historical past of Nazi violence towards trans folks as “persistent claims.” She then, once more in response to Caraballo’s pushback in reply, makes an attempt to separate “trans-identifying folks” from “homosexual folks, who had been certainly victims of heinous therapy by the Nazis.”
Caraballo’s reply, which cited sources together with Scientific American, and a thorough accounting by a historian in regards to the methods trans folks confronted persecution underneath Nazi Germany, didn’t obtain a rejoinder from Rowling.
April 2024: On April 1, 2024, Rowling posted a thread on X pegged to the implementation of the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act, which added “threatening or abusive behaviour which is meant to fire up hatred” round quite a few identities, together with age, faith, and transgender identification to the hate crimes statute; the regulation doesn’t, considerably controversially, embrace hatred of ladies. In her posts, Rowling spotlit quite a few girls, from a handful of convicted or reported intercourse offenders to UN appointees Katie Neeves and Munroe Bergdorf in addition to Mridul Wadhwa, head of a Scottish rape disaster heart. All the girls Rowling listed are reportedly trans — main the creator to write, “Clearly, the folks talked about within the above tweets aren’t girls in any respect, however males, each final one in every of them.” Rowling ended the thread with the hashtag #ArrestMe.
Could 2024: As a part of an X dialogue that started with Rowling intentionally misgendering a trans soccer supervisor, she doubled down in response to criticism, each by claiming that trans girls are “crossdressing straight males” and by evaluating trans identification to cultural appropriation.
“Do I get to be black if I like Motown and fancy myself in cornrows?” she wrote. “What if I declare the genuine me has at all times been black and that you simply’re being racist to me? Would that be OK, or would you discover it ludicrous and deeply offensive?” She didn’t reply to the various platform customers who replied to deal with her use of racist stereotypes or to level out that race, not like gender, is a genetic identification.
August 2024: Rowling contributed to ongoing harassment of and assaults on Olympics boxer Imane Khelif, who was one in every of two feminine boxers disqualified by the Russian-led Worldwide Boxing Affiliation (IBA) from the 2023 World Championships after an unspecified biochemical check. The check detected elevated ranges of testosterone in Khelif’s system; whereas the precise purpose for this result’s unconfirmed, cis girls can have elevated testosterone ranges on account of pure variations in intercourse traits. Though Khelif is a lady and was assigned feminine at beginning, many extremists have used this imprecise check end result to assault her with transphobic rhetoric, accusing her of being a person in disguise.
Each Khelif and the opposite IBA-disqualified athlete, Taiwan’s Lin Yu-ting, certified underneath the Worldwide Olympic Committee pointers and had been authorized to compete within the Olympics. However following a dramatic match on August 1, during which Khelif’s opponent Angela Carini of Italy forfeited in underneath a minute after exchanging just some hits, Khelif as soon as once more got here underneath scrutiny from transphobes on the suspicion of secretly being a person. Among the many transphobic commentary she confronted was vitriol from J.Okay. Rowling, who tweeted a photograph of Khelif Carini after Carini abruptly retired.
Carini, proven in tears within the picture after withdrawing as Khelif seems to be on, refused to shake Khelif’s hand after the match, which can have contributed to the idea she had been unfairly handled within the ring. She later stated to the BBC, nonetheless, that she wished to apologize to Khelif for not shaking her hand — an act Carini defined got here from anger at herself, not Khelif.
Rowling, nonetheless, noticed issues a lot otherwise. In her tweet, she framed the picture as a misogynistic assault, writing, “The smirk of a male who’s is aware of he’s protected by a misogynist sporting institution having fun with the misery of a lady he’s simply punched within the head, and whose life’s ambition he’s simply shattered. #Paris2024”
Once more, Khelif was born feminine and has at all times been a cisgender lady. Rowling appears to be arguing that any hormone-related variance in any respect amongst girls — regardless of the hundreds of thousands of ladies who’ve hormone imbalances — is sufficient to render them inauthentic or not “actual” girls. It’s an alarming improvement in her ongoing shift into excessive transphobic views.
It’s additionally deeply ironic. One of many factors Rowling first made in her prolonged 2020 manifesto was in regards to the want for cisgender girls to not really feel restricted by the confines of normative gender expression. “Finally a sexist world tries to throw on the female-bodied, it’s advantageous to not really feel pink, frilly and compliant inside your individual head,” she wrote, and later: “By no means have I seen girls denigrated and dehumanised to the extent they’re now.” But Rowling’s transphobia has progressed to such an extent that she has herself turn out to be a denigrator of a cisgender lady and a reinforcer of “compliant” femininity towards Khelif.
Khelif, who went on to win Olympic gold regardless of the harassment, reportedly filed a lawsuit alleging cyberbullying towards Rowling (Elon Musk can be named within the swimsuit). Shortly after the lawsuit grew to become public on August 13, Rowling went silent on X, resulting in hypothesis from many onlookers that she had pushed her transphobic narrative too far. On August 23, although, she once more appeared on the platform, spreading extra false and deceptive commentary on Khelif. Her first put up was a quote from a transphobic hit piece towards Khelif by Colin Wright, the previous managing editor of the far-right web site Quillette. She then went on to repost one other transphobic assertion, this time criticizing a latest Australian court docket ruling that upheld the authorized rights of trans girls.
April 2025: On April 16, 2025, the UK supreme court docket delivered a serious ruling that explicitly denied trans girls safety from discrimination on the premise of gender. The choice was prompted by a lawsuit introduced by For Girls Scotland; the transphobic group obtained a 70,000-pound ($93,000) donation from Rowling in 2024 to help them in funding the swimsuit. Two Scottish courts had rejected their arguments earlier than the case was appealed to the best court docket within the UK.
The five-judge court docket dominated unanimously that the definition of “girls” within the UK’s Equality Act applies solely to “organic” girls and doesn’t embrace trans girls, even when they’ve had their gender legally acknowledged. The ruling successfully sanctions the banning of trans girls from many public areas reserved for ladies, corresponding to girls’s locker rooms, hospitals, home violence shelters, and bogs; it might additionally lead different companies supposed for ladies to disclaim entry to trans girls. After the information broke, Rowling posted on X an image of herself smoking a cigar outside and wrote, “I find it irresistible when a plan comes collectively.” The clear affect Rowling has had on the dialog round trans rights within the UK, in addition to her direct financial help of the lawsuit, has intensified calls from former followers to cease supporting Harry Potter-related tasks.
Clarification, March 3, 2023, 12:15 pm ET: Up to date to make clear particulars of the character who’s “canceled” in The Ink Black Coronary heart.
Clarification, March 16, 2023, 3:20 pm ET: Up to date to make clear that Rowling’s remarks drew a comparability between the Loss of life Eaters and the trans rights “motion,” quite than trans folks.
Replace, April 18, 2025, 3:40 pm ET: This story, initially printed March 3, 2023, has been up to date a number of occasions, most lately with Rowling’s profitable funding of a transphobic lawsuit to strip trans girls of safety from gender-based discrimination underneath UK regulation.
