The Justice Division and Google wrapped a two-week listening to over the way to tackle Google’s unlawful monopoly in internet advertising expertise, establishing a pivotal antitrust showdown that would reshape the digital advert trade.
Driving the information. The listening to, held within the U.S. District Courtroom for the Japanese District of Virginia, concluded after testimony from greater than two dozen witnesses – together with Google executives, rival advert tech leaders, publishers, and professional economists.
- The Justice Division needs Google to dump its advert alternate and presumably elements of its writer instruments to revive competitors.
- Google argues {that a} breakup would disrupt publishers and advertisers, particularly small companies that rely on its methods.
- Either side will ship closing arguments in November, with Decide Leonie Brinkema anticipated to rule within the coming months.
Why we care. A court-ordered breakup of Google’s advert tech enterprise, irrespective of how unlikely, might reshape how digital adverts are purchased and bought – probably rising competitors, altering pricing, and altering entry to key Google promoting instruments.
What the federal government says. DOJ legal professionals declare that solely a structural divestiture — promoting off elements of Google’s advert tech stack — can actually finish its dominance.
- “Nothing wanting a structural divestment is enough to carry significant change,” mentioned lead DOJ litigator Julia Tarver Wooden.
What Google says. Google maintains that such a break up could be technically unworkable and would hurt publishers.
- “Divesting features of Google’s advert expertise is extra advanced than something I’ve completed in 10 years,” mentioned Google engineering director Glenn Berntson.
What others say. Rival advert tech companies like PubMatic and Equativ again the DOJ’s plan, arguing that behavioral cures or court docket orders wouldn’t cease Google from sustaining its dominance.
Between the strains. Decide Brinkema has signaled openness to a breakup, but additionally floated the concept of a court-enforced settlement that will limit Google’s conduct as an alternative of forcing divestitures.
What’s subsequent. Closing arguments are set for November, and a ruling is anticipated in early 2026 — a call that would have sweeping implications for digital promoting and Large Tech regulation.
Catch-up. Courtroom: Google’s unlawful advert tech monopoly harmed the open net
Search Engine Land is owned by Semrush. We stay dedicated to offering high-quality protection of selling matters. Except in any other case famous, this web page’s content material was written by both an worker or a paid contractor of Semrush Inc.
