iPadOS 26 is in some ways the foremost replace that iPad energy customers have been asking for. And in a new interview at MacStories, software program chief Craig Federighi explains why the iPad shouldn’t run macOS, how iPadOS 26 got here to fruition, and extra.
New interview covers iPadOS 26, macOS on iPad, and extra
Federico Viticci, who has lengthy pushed the iPad to its limits, sat down with Craig Federighi at WWDC for an interview about all issues iPadOS 26.
The total interview has been revealed right here as half of a bigger story containing Viticci’s preliminary takes on the brand new iPad software program.
There are a whole lot of highlights within the full piece, however listed here are only a couple I wish to spotlight.
Some vocal iPad customers have known as on Apple to carry macOS to the iPad. However in a yr the place Apple has centered on unifying the platforms, that didn’t occur.
Why not?
“We don’t wish to create a ship automobile or, , a spork”, Federighi begins. Seeing the confused look on my face, he continues: “I don’t know in case you have these in Italy. Somebody mentioned, “If a spoon’s nice, a fork’s nice, then let’s mix them right into a single utensil, proper?” It seems it’s not a superb spoon and it’s not a superb fork. It’s a foul concept. And so we don’t wish to construct sporks”. […]
Federighi tells me that “absolute consistency could be to optimize for nothing” once I ask him about how Apple weighs the concept of constant design throughout platforms in opposition to the truth that, based on them, every gadget of their lineup has its personal motive to be. “We would like consistency the place it is smart, however we tailor these experiences to every gadget”, he provides.
I don’t have to ask Federighi the perennial query of working macOS on the iPad, since he goes there on his personal. “I don’t assume the iPad ought to run macOS, however I believe the iPad might be impressed by parts of the Mac”, Federighi tells me. “I believe the Mac might be impressed by parts of iPad, and I believe that that’s occurred an incredible deal”.
In different phrases, Apple believes that bringing macOS to the iPad would imply forfeiting the distinctive motive every product exists individually. I can’t say I disagree.
On the subject of why iPadOS 26’s highly effective windowing and multitasking options took so lengthy, Federighi named a wide range of elements:
- efficiency constraints within the iPad’s early days
- the worth of energy customers’ suggestions over time
- and a hesitance so as to add Mac-like options from the beginning that may detract from the iPad’s actual essence
Talking of the iPad’s essence, Federighi provides an incredible reply when Viticci asks, “What’s an iPad in 2025?”
Make sure you take a look at the total article at MacStories to get the reply.
What are your takeaways from Federighi’s iPad remarks? Tell us within the feedback.
Finest iPad equipment
FTC: We use earnings incomes auto affiliate hyperlinks. Extra.
