California’s AB 942 Will Undermine Rooftop Photo voltaic – And Why That Issues

Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive stage summaries, join our every day e-newsletter, and/or observe us on Google Information!

California has lengthy been a trailblazer in clear power, with greater than two million houses powered by the solar. However a brand new proposal making its manner via Sacramento, Meeting Invoice 942 (AB 942), may throw a wrench within the state’s rooftop photo voltaic success story, and photo voltaic advocates aren’t taking it evenly.

This invoice doesn’t simply tweak coverage, it basically modifications the deal that tens of hundreds of photo voltaic prospects thought they’d with the state. For a lot of, it’s a damaged promise — and one that might price them.

What’s AB 942?

AB 942, launched by Assemblymember Lisa Calderon, would reduce the assured advantages of web power metering (NEM) agreements from 20 years down to only 10. That’s a giant deal.

NEM agreements are what make rooftop photo voltaic financially viable for most owners. They be certain that photo voltaic prospects get credited at retail charges for the surplus electrical energy they ship again to the grid. For anybody who went photo voltaic earlier than April 15, 2023, this 20-year time period was not simply implied — it was assured in state-backed contracts.

Now, underneath AB 942, not solely would these agreements get shortened, however in addition they wouldn’t carry over if the house is bought. Meaning in case you’ve obtained photo voltaic and need to promote your own home, the brand new purchaser could be pushed onto much less beneficiant phrases, making your photo voltaic funding manner much less engaging.

What It Means For Photo voltaic Clients

The monetary influence is actual. In keeping with latest estimates, the common photo voltaic buyer affected by this invoice may see their month-to-month utility payments rise by about $63. That provides as much as greater than $750 per 12 months. And for households who budgeted for photo voltaic primarily based on steady, predictable financial savings, that’s a serious monetary influence.

On the coronary heart of the problem is NEM 3.0, California’s new web metering coverage for photo voltaic prospects who signed up after April 2023. It slashed compensation for extra power by about 80%. It additionally induced California rooftop photo voltaic installations to drop 80%, in accordance with PV Journal.

If AB 942 passes, older prospects who signed up underneath NEM 1.0 or 2.0 could be pressured into this new system midway via their contracts. That is like altering the principles of the sport in the midst of the match, and for hundreds of households and small companies, it may throw years of economic planning out the window.

As reported by the San Francisco Chronicle,

Richard McCann, a guide for the California Photo voltaic and Storage Affiliation, stated rooftop photo voltaic prospects present almost 20% of energy throughout instances of the 12 months when power demand peaks and wholesale electrical energy is subsequently the costliest, similar to sizzling summertime days. He criticized the argument that photo voltaic advantages shift prices onto different prospects. “Why are we making an attempt to punish prospects we requested to do a very good deed?” McCann stated.

McCann is likely one of the co-authors of a latest white paper, Rooftop Photo voltaic Reduces Prices for All Ratepayers, and one other earlier than that, How Rooftop Photo voltaic Clients Profit Different Ratepayers Financially to the Tune of $1.5 Billion, each of which assist to place the misinform the claims made by proponents of the invoice.

Belief, Contracts, & Precedents

AB 942 can be stirring up critical authorized and moral considerations, with opponents arguing that the invoice breaks a transparent promise made to photo voltaic adopters. When somebody indicators a contract with the state that ensures 20 years of particular phrases, these phrases shouldn’t be up for grabs 5 or ten years later.

Steve Campbell from Vote Photo voltaic issued a press release in regards to the proposed invoice, saying:

“AB 942 is a direct assault on California households who made long-term investments in photo voltaic with the promise of honest, 20-year Web Vitality Metering agreements — ensures that have been clearly outlined within the state’s personal shopper safety paperwork.

“Altering the principles after the actual fact isn’t simply unfair — it dangers eroding public confidence within the integrity of California’s regulatory system. Greater than one million Californians signed contracts and state-issued guides in good religion, trusting that regulators would maintain their phrase. Retroactively breaking these agreements would set a harmful precedent for all shopper protections in California.”

“As an alternative of pulling the rug out from underneath current photo voltaic prospects, lawmakers and the California Public Utilities Fee (CPUC) ought to use the instruments already at their disposal to decrease payments and assist low-income communities — like utility enterprise mannequin reform, cheap income-based fastened costs, and focused use of the California Local weather Credit score to deal with low-wealth prospects.”

The belief issue issues. California has relied closely on grassroots photo voltaic adoption to fulfill its local weather objectives. If householders and companies begin second-guessing whether or not they can depend on the principles staying put, it may put a chill on future photo voltaic investments.

Who Actually Advantages?

Supporters of AB 942 argue that the present system favors wealthier householders who can afford photo voltaic, leaving lower-income ratepayers to select up extra of the tab for sustaining the grid. However right here’s the twist: photo voltaic advocates say the true cause utility payments are hovering isn’t due to photo voltaic prospects — it’s truly as a consequence of runaway utility spending. In keeping with shopper and environmental watchdogs, utility infrastructure prices have ballooned by over 300% up to now 20 years, although power use has stayed flat.

So whereas AB 942 claims to be about equity, critics argue it’s actually a distraction — one which lets the massive utilities off the hook whereas penalizing prospects who took motion to scale back their carbon footprint and electrical energy payments.

What About California’s Clear Vitality Targets?

California has probably the most bold clear power targets within the nation: 100% clear electrical energy by 2045. Rooftop photo voltaic performs an enormous position in that imaginative and prescient. But when AB 942 turns into legislation, it may discourage individuals from going photo voltaic, and even push some to disconnect their current methods.

At a time once we want extra clear power, not much less, that’s a step within the flawed route.

AB 942 isn’t only a technical coverage change, it’s a sign. It tells Californians that even in case you observe the principles, put money into clear know-how, and do the fitting factor for the planet, the principles can nonetheless be rewritten. It’s a message that undermines belief, threatens financial savings, and dangers derailing California’s progress on local weather. The stakes couldn’t be larger — not only for photo voltaic prospects, however for anybody who cares about the way forward for clear power.