Amazon OpenSearch Ingestion 101: Set CloudWatch alarms for key metrics

Amazon OpenSearch Ingestion is a completely managed, serverless information pipeline that simplifies the method of ingesting information into Amazon OpenSearch Service and OpenSearch Serverless collections. Some key ideas embrace:

• Supply – Enter part that specifies how the pipeline ingests the info. Every pipeline has a single supply which may be both push-based and pull-based.
• Processors – Intermediate processing items that may filter, rework, and enrich data earlier than supply.
• Sink – Output part that specifies the vacation spot(s) to which the pipeline publishes information. It could publish data to a number of locations.
• Buffer – It’s the layer between the supply and the sink. It serves as short-term storage for occasions, decoupling the supply from the downstream processors and sinks. Amazon OpenSearch Ingestion additionally gives a persistent buffer possibility for push-based sources
• Useless-letter queues (DLQs) – Configures Amazon Easy Storage Service (Amazon S3) to seize data that fail to put in writing to the sink, enabling error dealing with and troubleshooting.

This end-to-end information ingestion service will help you accumulate, course of, and ship information to your OpenSearch environments with out the necessity to handle underlying infrastructure.

This submit supplies an in-depth take a look at establishing Amazon CloudWatch alarms for OpenSearch Ingestion pipelines. It goes past our beneficial alarms to assist determine bottlenecks within the pipeline, whether or not that’s within the sink, the OpenSearch clusters information is being despatched to, the processors, or the pipeline not pulling or accepting sufficient from the supply. This submit will enable you proactively monitor and troubleshoot your OpenSearch Ingestion pipelines.

Overview

Monitoring your OpenSearch Ingestion pipelines is essential for catching and addressing points early. By understanding the important thing metrics and establishing the fitting alarms, you possibly can proactively handle the well being and efficiency of your information ingestion workflows. Within the following sections, we offer particulars about alarm metrics for various sources, displays, and sinks. The precise values for the edge, interval, and datapoints to alarm used for alarms can differ primarily based on the person use case and necessities.

Stipulations

To create an OpenSearch Ingestion pipeline, seek advice from Creating Amazon OpenSearch Ingestion pipelines. For creating CloudWatch alarms, seek advice from Create a CloudWatch alarm primarily based on a static threshold.

You may allow logging for OpenSearch Ingestion Pipeline, which captures numerous log messages throughout pipeline operations and ingestion exercise, together with errors, warnings, and informational messages. For particulars on enabling and monitoring pipeline logs, seek advice from Monitoring pipeline logs

Sources

The entry level of your pipeline is usually the place monitoring ought to start. By setting acceptable alarms for supply elements, you possibly can shortly determine ingestion bottlenecks or connection points. The next desk summarizes key alarm metrics for various sources.

Processors

The next desk supplies particulars about alarm metrics for various processors.

Sinks and DLQs

The next desk accommodates particulars about alarm metrics for various sinks and DLQs.

Buffer

The next desk accommodates particulars about alarm metrics for buffers.

Reference Information

The next present steerage for resolving widespread pipeline points together with basic reference.

REF-001: WARN-level Log Evaluate

Evaluate WARN-level logs within the pipeline logs to determine the exception particulars.

REF-002: ERROR-level Log Evaluate

Evaluate ERROR-level logs within the pipeline logs to determine the exception particulars.

REF-003: S3 Objects Failed

When troubleshooting growing s3ObjectsFailed.rely values, monitor these particular metrics to slender down the foundation trigger:

• s3ObjectsAccessDenied.rely – This metric increments when the pipeline encounters Entry Denied or Forbidden errors whereas studying S3 objects. Widespread causes embrace:
• Inadequate permissions within the pipeline position.
• Restrictive S3 bucket coverage not permitting the pipeline position entry.
• For cross-account S3 buckets, incorrectly configured bucket_owners mapping.
• s3ObjectsNotFound.rely – This metric increments when the pipeline receives Not Discovered errors whereas making an attempt to learn S3 objects.

For additional help with the beneficial actions, contact AWS assist.

REF-004: Configuring Alarm for distinction in totalOpenShards.max and activeShardsInProcessing.worth for Amazon DynamoDB supply.

1. Open the CloudWatch console at https://console.aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/.
2. Within the navigation pane, select Alarms, All alarms.
3. Select Create alarm.
4. Select Choose Metric.
5. Choose Supply.
6. In supply, following JSON can be utilized after updating the , and .

   {
       "metrics": [
           [ { "expression": "m1-e1", "label": "Expression2", "id": "e2", "period": 900 } ],
           [ { "expression": "FLOOR((m2/15)+0.5)", "label": "Expression1", "id": "activeShardsInProcessing", "visible": false, "period": 900 } ],
           [ "AWS/OSIS", ".dynamodb.totalOpenShards.max", "PipelineName", "", { "stat": "Maximum", "id": "m1", "visible": false } ],
           [ ".", ".dynamodb.activeShardsInProcessing.value", ".", ".", { "stat": "Average", "id": "m2", "visible": false } ]
       ],
       "view": "timeSeries",
       "stacked": false,
       "interval": 900,
       "area": ""
   }

Let’s evaluate couple of situations primarily based on the above metrics.

Situation 1 – Perceive and Decrease Pipeline Latency

Latency inside a pipeline is constructed up of three primary elements:

• The time it takes to ship paperwork through bulk requests to OpenSearch,
• the time it takes for information to undergo the pipeline processors, and
• the time that information sits within the pipeline buffer

Bulk requests and processors (final two objects within the earlier listing) are the foundation causes for why the buffer builds up and results in latency.

To watch how a lot information is being saved within the buffer, monitor the bufferUsage.worth metric. The one approach to decrease latency throughout the buffer is to optimize the pipeline processors and sink bulk request latency, relying on which of these is the bottleneck.

The bulkRequestLatency metric measures the time taken to execute bulk requests, together with retries, and can be utilized to observe write efficiency to the OpenSearch sink. If this metric studies an unusually excessive worth, it signifies that the OpenSearch sink could also be overloaded, inflicting elevated processing time. To troubleshoot additional, evaluate the bulkRequestNumberOfRetries.rely metric to substantiate whether or not the excessive latency is because of rejections from OpenSearch which might be resulting in retries, comparable to throttling (429 errors) or different causes. If doc errors are current, study the configured DLQ to determine the failed doc particulars. Moreover, the max_retries parameter may be configured within the pipeline configuration to restrict the variety of retries. Nevertheless, if the documentErrors metric studies zero, the bulkRequestNumberOfRetries.rely can also be zero, and the bulkRequestLatency stays excessive, it’s doubtless an indicator that the OpenSearch sink is overloaded. On this case, evaluate the vacation spot metrics for added particulars.

If the bulkRequestLatency metric is low (for instance, lower than 1.5 seconds) and the bulkRequestNumberOfRetries metric is reported as 0, then the bottleneck is probably going throughout the pipeline processors. To watch the efficiency of the processors, evaluate the .timeElapsed.avg metric. This metric studies the time taken for the processor to finish processing of a batch of data. For instance, if a grok processor is reporting a a lot increased worth than different processors for timeElapsed, it could be resulting from a sluggish grok sample that may be optimized and even changed with a extra performant processor, relying on the use case.

Situation 2 – Understanding and Resolving Doc Errors to OpenSearch

The documentErrors.rely metric tracks the variety of paperwork that didn’t be despatched by bulk requests. The failure can occur resulting from numerous causes comparable to mapping conflicts, invalid information codecs, or schema mismatches. When this metric studies a non-zero worth, it signifies that some paperwork are being rejected by OpenSearch. To determine the foundation trigger, study the configured Useless Letter Queue (DLQ), which captures the failed paperwork together with error particulars. The DLQ supplies details about why particular paperwork failed, enabling you to determine patterns comparable to incorrect subject varieties, lacking required fields, or information that exceeds dimension limits. For instance, discover the pattern DLQ objects for widespread points beneath:

Mapper parsing exception:

{"dlqObjects": [{
        "pluginId": "opensearch",
        "pluginName": "opensearch",
        "pipelineName": "",
        "failedData": {
            "index": "",
            "indexId": null,
            "status": 400,
            "message": "failed to parse field [] of kind [integer] in doc with id ''. Preview of subject's worth: 'N/A' brought on by For enter string: "N/A"",
            "doc": {}
        },
        "timestamp": "…"
    }]}

Right here, OpenSearch can’t retailer the textual content string “N/A” in a subject that’s just for numbers, so it rejects the doc and shops it within the DLQ.

Restrict of complete fields exceeded:

{"dlqObjects": [{
        "pluginId": "opensearch",
        "pluginName": "opensearch",
        "pipelineName": "",
        "failedData": {
            "index": "",
            "indexId": null,
            "status": 400,
            "message": "Limit of total fields [] has been exceeded",
            "doc": {}
        },
        "timestamp": "…"
    }]}

The index.mapping.total_fields.restrict setting is the parameter that controls the utmost variety of fields allowed in an index mapping, and exceeding this restrict will trigger indexing operations to fail. You may examine if all these fields are required or leverage numerous processors supplied by OpenSearch Ingestion to rework the info.

As soon as these points are recognized, you possibly can both right the supply information, alter the pipeline configuration to rework the info appropriately, or modify the OpenSearch index mapping to accommodate the incoming information format.

Clear up

When establishing alarms for monitoring your OpenSearch Ingestion pipelines, it’s essential to be conscious of the potential prices concerned. Every alarm you configure will incur costs primarily based on the CloudWatch pricing mannequin.

To keep away from pointless bills, we advocate rigorously evaluating your alarm necessities and configuring them accordingly. Solely arrange the alarms which might be important in your use case, and often evaluate your alarm configurations to determine and take away unused or redundant alarms.

Conclusion

On this submit, we explored the excellent monitoring capabilities for OpenSearch Ingestion pipelines via CloudWatch alarms, overlaying key metrics throughout numerous sources, processors, and sinks. Though this submit highlights essentially the most vital metrics, there’s extra to find. For a deeper dive, seek advice from the next assets:

Efficient monitoring via CloudWatch alarms is essential for sustaining wholesome ingestion pipelines and sustaining optimum information move.

In regards to the authors