Capability to create whole shows with only a immediate? Single immediate technology is one other welcome addition to an already strong Gemini chatbot. From vernacular language assist to superior photos enhancing capabilities, Gemini has slowly been transferring in the direction of the subsequent part of its AI journey. Whether or not this improve delivers what it states or it’s simply one other presentation, we’ll work out on this article.
The Launch
Google simply introduced by way of Gemini App’s X deal with, “Go from clean slide to polished presentation quicker with Canvas in Gemini” asserting the discharge of Presentation creation talents of Gemini. This was a very long time coming, contemplating most of its contemporaries like Kimi, ChatGPT have already launched such performance some time again. Which in itself was a very long time coming, contemplating third-party instruments like Gamma.app have already develop into a family title, resulting from their early adopter benefit, even earlier than these arrived.
However now the wait is over, and we’ve got Gemini to ourselves. Let’s see how nicely it performs in on a regular basis presentation duties.

Fingers-On
I’d be testing Gemini’s presentation creation capabilities on the next duties:
- Presentation technology from a immediate
- Presentation technology from a pre-existing doc
This is able to check not solely how good it’s in synthesising offered data, but additionally in producing from scratch.
Activity 1: Making a Presentation from Scratch
Immediate: “Create a presentation on the subject: Gojo vs Sukuna.”
Response: The next presentation was offered because the response:
Opinion: The presentation was acceptable. It consisted of a mixture of visuals and data. Much more data within the type of slides, may have been added, nevertheless it’s a adequate place to begin. One factor to notice is that the slides that had been obtained on the finish, had .html as its extension, moderately than .pdf or .pptx as we’d’ve anticipated.

This led the obtain button to obtain the .html file. Via this html file, the slides couldn’t be obtained. This makes the obtain button virtually ineffective, on this situation.
Activity 2: Making a Presentation from a Doc
Immediate: “Right here is an article that I’m engaged on. May you create a presentation for it.”
The doc offered as an enter was the draft model of the next article (similar contents):
Methods to Construct a Sensible AI Voice Assistant with Vapi: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
Response: The next presentation was offered because the response:
Opinion: The presentation was a transparent miss from what was anticipated. It was on the subject “AI’s Rise in Inventive Fields” whereas the docx file contained the draft on “Methods to Construct a Sensible AI Voice Assistant with Vapi”. The presentation wasn’t associated to the subject by any means.
I used to be questioning, how would different AI-powered presentation makers fare on this particular activity. For that, I offered the identical doc to Gamma.ai, and right here’s the end result:
The presentation was quite a bit higher than the one offered by Gemini. It was quite a bit nearer to the subject and understood the context sufficiently.
Verdict: Does it take the cake?
If it’s ease of entry, then Gemini takes the cake. Providing a mess of companies and options at a centralized supply. If it’s about making good presentation, then in all probability not. The presentation options of Gemini go away quite a bit to be anticipated. From lengthy manufacturing instances, to lacklustre slides, the wait wasn’t price it. Listed below are a number of the issues I discovered throughout its use:
- No Textual content Emphasis: The presentation are formatting agnostic. As a substitute of utilizing daring/italics and different types of textual content emphasis, it makes use of the markdown for it.

- Lacking Pictures: Firstly, the presentation are devoid of photos. The mannequin didn’t even try to make use of AI generated photos for including some visible tinge. And at locations, the place it ought to be, one thing it isn’t.

- Unsuitable Extension: Typically the extension of the presentation isn’t any the perfect one (extra in activity 1).

- Misguided Reasoning: The mannequin very often misinterprets the subject for which the presentation is to be made. That is particularly the case if the mannequin is offered a doc to learn. The next is the considering of the mannequin, within the 2nd activity:
Until, the duty is for the naked minimal likening classroom shows, Gemini’s new presentation function in all probability gained’t come in useful.
Conclusion
“Create a presentation with a single immediate” is what they mentioned. Which is true, in the event you’re okay with a placeholder for a presentation. It’s exhausting for me to understand its advantages, when Gemini fails to create a passable presentation on one thing so simple as “Apple (fruit)”. I’d advise sticking to its options, until its efficiency improves. If it’s a capstone for what’s to observe, then it’s a step in the correct path. Hopefully its efficiency appreciates with time, identical to it did with nano banana.
Often Requested Questions
A. Sure, however count on a draft, not a sophisticated deck. It’s helpful for beginning factors, not last slides.
A. It tries, however accuracy isn’t dependable but. In testing, it created slides unrelated to the supply doc.
A. Proper now, Gemini outputs an HTML model of slides. It doesn’t correctly export to PPT or PDF but, which limits usability.
A. It trails behind choices like Gamma and ChatGPT in slide construction, depth, and context understanding.
A. It’s finest for fast placeholders or school-level slides. For polished, client-ready decks, select different instruments till Gemini matures. It has potential, however proper now the gaps present. Deal with it as a drafting device, not a finished-product machine.
Login to proceed studying and luxuriate in expert-curated content material.

