Kimi K2 (by Moonshot AI) and Llama 4 (by Meta) are each state-of-the-art open massive language fashions (LLMs) primarily based on Combination-of-Consultants (MoE) structure. Every mannequin focuses on totally different areas and is geared toward superior use instances, with totally different strengths and philosophies. Until every week in the past, Llama 4 was the undisputed king of the open-source LLMs, however now lots of people are saying that Kimi’s newest mannequin is giving Meta’s greatest a run for its cash. On this weblog, we are going to check these two fashions for numerous duties to search out which of Kimi K2 vs Llama 4 is one of the best open-source mannequin. Let the battle of one of the best start!
Kimi K2 vs Llama 4: Mannequin Comparability
Kimi K2 by Moonshot AI is an open-source, combination of consultants (MoE) mannequin with 1 trillion complete parameters, with 32 B lively parameters. The mannequin comes with a 128K token context window. The mannequin is skilled with the Muon optimizer and excels at duties like coding, reasoning, and agentic duties like software integration and multi-step reasoning.
Llama 4 by Meta AI is a household of mixture-of-experts-based multimodal fashions that had been launched in three totally different variants: Scout, Maverick, and Behemoth. Scout comes with 17B lively parameters & 10 M token window; Maverick with 17 B lively parameters and 1 M token window, whereas Behemoth (nonetheless in coaching) is claimed to supply 288 B lively parameters with over 2 trillion tokens in complete! The fashions include robust context dealing with, improved administration of delicate content material, and decrease refusal charges
| Characteristic | Kimi K2 | Llama 4 Scout | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mannequin sort | MoE massive LLM, open-weight | MoE multimodal, open-weight | MoE multimodal, open-weight |
| Energetic params | 32 B | 17 B | 17 B |
| Whole params | 1 T | 109 B | 400 B |
| Context window | 128 Ok tokens | 10 million tokens | 1 million tokens |
| Key strengths | Coding, reasoning, agentic duties, open | Light-weight, lengthy context, environment friendly | Coding, reasoning, efficiency rivaling proprietary fashions |
| Accessibility | Obtain and use freely | Public with license constraints | Public with license constraints |
To know extra about these fashions, their benchmarks and efficiency, learn our earlier articles:
Kimi K2 vs Llama 4: Benchmark Comparability
Kimi K2 and Llama 4 each are desk toppers of their efficiency on numerous benchmarks. Here’s a transient breakdown of their efficiency:
| Benchmark | What does this imply? | Kimi K2 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-Diamond | That is to check LLM reasoning in superior Physics | 75.1 % | 67.7 % |
| AIME | That is to check the LLM for mathematical reasoning | 49.5 % | 25.2 % |
| LiveCodeBench | This assessments a mannequin’s real-world coding skills. | 53.7 % | 47.3 % |
| SWE‑bench | This assessments a mannequin’s means to put in writing production-ready code | 65.8 % | 18.4 % |
| OJBench | It measures the mannequin’s problem-solving means. | 27.1 % | — |
| MMLU‑Professional | A tutorial benchmark that assessments common information and comprehension | — | 79.4 % |
Kimi K2 and Llama 4: The right way to entry?
To check these fashions for various duties, we are going to use the chat interface.
Choose the mannequin from the mannequin drop down current the the highest left facet of the display screen.
Kimi K2 vs Llama 4: Efficiency Comparability
Now that we’ve seen numerous fashions and benchmark comparisons between Kimi K2 and Llama 4, we are going to now check them for numerous options like:
- Multimodality
- Agentic Behaviour and Device Use
- Multilingual Capabilities
Process 1: Multimodality
- Llama 4: Natively multimodal (can collectively course of pictures and textual content), therefore perfect for doc evaluation, visible grounding, and data-rich situations.
- Kimi K2: Centered on superior reasoning, coding, and agentic software use, however has much less native multimodal assist in comparison with Llama
Immediate: “Extract Contents from this picture”
Output:
Overview:
The outputs generated by the 2 LLMs are starkly totally different. With Llama 4 it feels prefer it learn by means of all of the textual content of the picture like a professional. Nonetheless, Kimi K2 states that the handwriting is illegible and may’t be learn. However if you look intently, the textual content supplied by Llama is just not the identical because the textual content that was there within the picture! The mannequin made up textual content at a number of locations (instance – affected person title, even analysis), which is the height degree of LLM hallucination.
On the face it might really feel like we’re getting an in depth picture evaluation, however Llama 4’s output is certain to dupe you. Whereas Kimi K2 – proper from the get go – mentions that it could actually’t perceive what’s written, this bitter reality is approach higher than an exquisite lie.
Thus, in the case of picture evaluation, each Kimi K2 and Llama 4 nonetheless wrestle and are unable to learn complicated pictures correctly.
Process 2: Agentic Conduct and Device Use
- Kimi K2: Particularly post-trained for agentic workflows – can execute intentions, independently run shell instructions, construct apps/web sites, name APIs, automate information science, and conduct multi-step workflows out-of-the-box.
- Llama 4: Though good in logic, imaginative and prescient, and evaluation, its agentic conduct is just not as robust or as open (principally multimodal reasoning).
Immediate: “Discover the highest 5 shares on NSE at present and inform me what their share worth was on 12 January 2025?”
Output:
Overview:
Llama 4 is just not up for this process. It lacks agentic capabilities, and therefore, it could actually’t entry the net search software to entry the insights wanted for the immediate. Now, coming to Kimi K2, on the primary look, it might seem that Kimi K2 has achieved the job! However a better assessment is required right here. It’s able to utilizing totally different instruments primarily based on the duty, however it didn’t perceive the duty accurately. It was anticipated to examine for the highest inventory performers for at present, and provides their costs for 12 Jan 2025; as a substitute, it simply gave a listing of prime performers of 12 Jan 2025. Agentic – Sure! However Good – not a lot – Kimi K2 is simply okay.
Process 3: Multilingual Capabilities
- Llama 4: Skilled on information for 200 totally different languages, together with stable multi-lingual and cross-lingual expertise.
- Kimi K2: World assist, however particularly robust in Chinese language and English (highest scores on Chinese language language benchmarks).
Immediate: “Translate the contents of the pdf to Hindi.PDF Hyperlink“
Word: To check Llama 4 for this immediate, you can too take a picture of the PDF and share it as many of the free LLM suppliers don’t permit importing paperwork of their free plan.
Output:
Overview:
At this process, each fashions carried out equally properly. Each Llama 4 and Kimi K2 effectively translate French into Hindi. Each the fashions recognised the supply of the poem, too. The response generated by each fashions was the identical and proper. Thus, in the case of multilingual assist, Kimi K2 is nearly as good as Llama 4.
Open-source nature and price
Kimi K2: Totally open-source, might be deployed regionally, weights and API can be found to everybody, prices for inference and API are considerably decrease ($0.15- $0.60/1M enter tokens, $2.50/1M output tokens).
Llama 4: solely out there below a neighborhood license (restrictions might happen by area), barely greater infrastructure necessities because of context measurement, and is typically much less versatile for self-hosted, manufacturing use instances.
Last Verdict:
| Process | Kimi K2 | Llama 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Multimodality | ✅ | ❌ |
| Agentic conduct & Device use | ✅ | ❌ |
| Multilingual Capabilities | ❌ | ✅ |
- Use Kimi K2: If you’d like high-end coding, reasoning, and agentic automation, significantly when valuing full open-source availability, extraordinarily low value, and native deployment. Kimi K2 is at present forward on key measures in case you are a developer making high-end instruments, workflows, or utilizing LLMs on a finances.
- Use Llama 4: In the event you want extraordinarily massive context reminiscence, nice understanding of language, and open supply availability. It stands out in visible evaluation, doc processing, and cross-modal analysis/enterprise duties.
Conclusion
To say, Kimi K2 is healthier than Llama 4 would possibly simply be an overstatement. Each fashions have their professionals and cons. Llama 4 may be very fast, whereas Kimi K2 is kind of complete. Llama 4 is extra susceptible to make issues up, whereas Kimi K2 would possibly draw back from even attempting. Each are nice open-source fashions and supply customers a spread of options similar to these by closed-source fashions like GPT 4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and extra. To choose one out of the 2 is barely difficult, however you possibly can take the decision primarily based in your process.
Or perhaps attempt them each and see which one you want higher?
Knowledge Scientist | AWS Licensed Options Architect | AI & ML Innovator
As a Knowledge Scientist at Analytics Vidhya, I concentrate on Machine Studying, Deep Studying, and AI-driven options, leveraging NLP, laptop imaginative and prescient, and cloud applied sciences to construct scalable functions.
With a B.Tech in Laptop Science (Knowledge Science) from VIT and certifications like AWS Licensed Options Architect and TensorFlow, my work spans Generative AI, Anomaly Detection, Faux Information Detection, and Emotion Recognition. Enthusiastic about innovation, I attempt to develop clever methods that form the way forward for AI.
Login to proceed studying and luxuriate in expert-curated content material.
