Meta’s expertise chief is asking OpenAI CEO Sam Altman “dishonest” for claiming that Meta is providing nine-figure compensation packages to new staff on its secretive AI superintelligence crew.
Based on The Verge, at a company-wide all-hands assembly on Thursday, Meta’s Chief Expertise Officer, Andrew Bosworth, pushed again towards Altman’s remarks final week that Meta was providing “$100 million signing bonuses” and “greater than that” in compensation to poach OpenAI staff.
“Sam is simply being dishonest right here,” Bosworth, 43, mentioned on the leaked assembly. “He is suggesting that we’re doing this for each single particular person… Look, you guys, the market’s sizzling. It is not that sizzling.”
Associated: Meta Takes on ChatGPT By Releasing a Standalone AI App: ‘A Lengthy Journey’
Altman, 40, mentioned final week that he was “actually completely happy” that none of OpenAI’s “finest folks” had chosen to affix Meta. Now, Bosworth says that OpenAI workers aren’t becoming a member of Meta as a result of Altman has been countering Meta’s provides, “making a small market” of doable staff to guide Meta’s AI efforts.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Photograph by Justin Sullivan/Getty Photos
Nonetheless, Meta has efficiently poached expertise from OpenAI. Based on a Thursday TechCrunch report, AI researcher Trapit Bansal, who has been working at OpenAI since 2022, has left the corporate for Meta. A Wednesday report from The Wall Avenue Journal revealed that Meta poached three further OpenAI researchers who labored at OpenAI’s Zurich workplace: Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Xiaohua Zhai.
Beyer posted on X on Thursday that the trio didn’t obtain $100 million signing bonuses, calling the rumor “pretend information.”
hey all, couple fast notes:
1) sure, we will likely be becoming a member of Meta.
2) no, we didn’t get 100M sign-on, that is pretend information.Enthusiastic about what’s forward although, will share extra in due time!
cc @__kolesnikov__ and @XiaohuaZhai.
— Lucas Beyer (bl16) (@giffmana) June 26, 2025
Meta has additionally poached the CEO of $32 billion AI startup, Secure Superintelligence, Daniel Gross, and former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, 41, has just lately doubled down on a push for superintelligence, AI that exceeds human intelligence in reasoning, reminiscence, and information. Based on a Bloomberg report from earlier this month, Zuckerberg is assembling a crew of round 50 specialists to work on superintelligence with the objective of someday infusing it throughout the corporate’s merchandise, together with the bestselling Ray-Ban Meta sensible glasses.
Meta additionally made one in all its largest offers but this month, investing $14.3 billion in Scale AI, a startup that gives knowledge to coach AI methods. As a part of the deal, Scale AI’s 28-year-old CEO Alexandr Wang will be part of Meta in a management function on the superintelligence crew. The funding prompted Scale AI’s valuation to greater than double from $14 billion to $29 billion.
AI voice cloning startup Play AI can also be reportedly in talks with Meta about an acquisition, although the deal has but to be publicly introduced.
Meta inventory was up over 21% year-to-date on the time of writing. The corporate is without doubt one of the most dear on the planet, with a market capitalization of over $1.8 trillion. OpenAI was value $300 billion as of late March.
Meta’s expertise chief is asking OpenAI CEO Sam Altman “dishonest” for claiming that Meta is providing nine-figure compensation packages to new staff on its secretive AI superintelligence crew.
Based on The Verge, at a company-wide all-hands assembly on Thursday, Meta’s Chief Expertise Officer, Andrew Bosworth, pushed again towards Altman’s remarks final week that Meta was providing “$100 million signing bonuses” and “greater than that” in compensation to poach OpenAI staff.
“Sam is simply being dishonest right here,” Bosworth, 43, mentioned on the leaked assembly. “He is suggesting that we’re doing this for each single particular person… Look, you guys, the market’s sizzling. It is not that sizzling.”
The remainder of this text is locked.
Be part of Entrepreneur+ right now for entry.
