ESET takes half in world operation to disrupt Lumma Stealer

ESET has collaborated with Microsoft, BitSight, Lumen, Cloudflare, CleanDNS, and GMO Registry in a worldwide disruption operation in opposition to Lumma Stealer, an notorious malware-as-a-service (MaaS) infostealer. The operation focused Lumma Stealer infrastructure with all identified C&C servers prior to now yr, rendering the exfiltration community, or a big a part of it, nonoperational.

Key factors of this blogpost:

• ESET took half in a coordinated world operation to disrupt Lumma Stealer.
• ESET supplied technical evaluation and statistical info, and extracted important information from tens of hundreds of malware samples.
• We offer an outline of the Lumma Stealer MaaS ecosystem.
• We additionally present technical evaluation and an outline of the evolution of Lumma Stealer’s key static and dynamic properties, which have been essential to the disruption effort.

Disruption contribution

ESET automated techniques processed tens of hundreds of Lumma Stealer samples, dissecting them to extract key components, corresponding to C&C servers and affiliate identifiers. This allowed us to repeatedly monitor Lumma Stealer’s exercise, observe improvement updates, cluster associates, and extra.

Infostealer malware households, like Lumma Stealer, are usually only a foreshadowing of a future, rather more devastating assault. Harvested credentials are a valued commodity within the cybercrime underground, offered by preliminary entry brokers to varied different cybercriminals, together with ransomware associates. Lumma Stealer has been one of the crucial prevalent infostealers over the previous two years, and ESET telemetry (see Determine 1) confirms that it has left no a part of the world untouched.

Lumma Stealer builders had been actively creating and sustaining their malware. We’ve usually seen code updates starting from minor bug fixes to finish substitute of string encryption algorithms and modifications to the community protocol. The operators additionally actively maintained the shared exfiltration community infrastructure. Between June 17^th, 2024 and Could 1^st, 2025, we noticed a complete of three,353 distinctive C&C domains, averaging roughly 74 new domains rising every week together with occasional updates to Telegram-based dead-drop resolvers (see Determine 2). We talk about the small print of the community infrastructure later within the blogpost.

This ongoing evolution underscores the numerous risk posed by Lumma Stealer and highlights the significance and complexity of the disruption effort.

Background

Over the previous two years, Lumma Stealer (also called LummaC or LummaC2) has emerged as one of the crucial energetic infostealers within the cybercrime ecosystem, changing into a popular device amongst cybercriminals resulting from its energetic improvement of malware options and its infrastructure being offered as a service.

Malware as a service

Lumma Stealer adopts the idea of malware as a service (MaaS), the place associates pay a month-to-month charge, based mostly on their tier, to obtain the newest malware builds and the community infrastructure needed for information exfiltration. Associates have entry to a administration panel with a user-friendly interface the place they will obtain exfiltrated information and harvested credentials.

The tiered subscription mannequin ranges from USD 250 to USD 1,000 per 30 days, every with more and more subtle options. Decrease tiers embody primary filtering and log obtain choices, whereas greater tiers provide customized information assortment, evasion instruments, and early entry to new options. The costliest plan emphasizes stealth and flexibility, providing distinctive construct era and decreased detection.

The operators of Lumma Stealer have additionally created a Telegram market with a ranking system for associates to promote stolen information with out intermediaries. {The marketplace} has been nicely documented in Cybereason analysis. Furthermore, they preserve public documentation of the administration panel for associates and periodically share updates and fixes on hacking boards, as proven in Determine 3.

Open documentation not solely helps associates with much less expertise to make use of the malware service, but additionally supplies invaluable insights for safety researchers. Builders deal with malware builds, information pipelining, and infrastructure upkeep, whereas associates are answerable for distributing the malware. This info, mixed with the service’s reputation, ends in all kinds of compromise vectors.

Widespread distribution strategies embody phishing, cracked software program, and different malware downloaders together with SmokeLoader, DarkGate, Amadey, Vidar, and others. Common phishing schemes contain ClickFix or faux CAPTCHA net pages, fraudulent boards with cracked software program, faux GitHub repositories, fraudulent hyperlinks on Reddit boards, and plenty of extra.

Technical evaluation

Quite a few public analyses have already been written about Lumma Stealer and its compromise vectors. Our focus right here, nonetheless, is on the elements related to the disruption. On this part, we are going to briefly introduce the important thing static and dynamic properties that now we have been actively extracting from Lumma Stealer.

Static properties of Lumma Stealer

Numerous info comes embedded in Lumma Stealer malware samples. This naturally presents an excellent goal for automated extraction. Moreover the apparent information of curiosity – C&C server domains – the samples additionally include identifier strings that tie the pattern to a selected affiliate and a marketing campaign, and an non-compulsory identifier resulting in a customized dynamic configuration. These identifiers are utilized in community communication with the C&C server throughout information exfiltration and requests for dynamic configuration. Within the sections under, we take a look at these properties in depth.

C&C domains

Every Lumma Stealer pattern comprises an inventory of 9 encrypted C&C domains. Whereas the encryption strategies have developed over time, the attribute array construction has remained constant as much as the time of writing.

Primarily based on Lumma Stealer’s inside pattern versioning, which is closely protected by stack string obfuscation, we all know that up till January 2025, the C&C domains within the samples have been protected by an XOR perform and base64 encoding (see Determine 4). When the base64-encoded string was decoded, it revealed a construction the place the primary 32 bytes served as an XOR key, and the remaining bytes contained the encrypted C&C area.

In January 2025, Lumma Stealer transitioned the safety of the C&C record to ChaCha20 encryption with a single hardcoded key and nonce (see Determine 5). This safety of the C&C record within the Lumma Stealer binaries has remained the identical up till the time of publication.

Useless-drop resolvers

Since June 2024, every Lumma Stealer construct got here with a brand new function for acquiring a backup C&C. If no C&C server from the static config responds to Lumma Stealer, then the backup C&C is extracted from a dummy Steam profile net web page performing as a dead-drop resolver. The Steam profile URL is closely protected within the binary, the identical means because the model string. The encrypted backup C&C URL is ready within the Steam profile title, as proven in Determine 6, and the safety is a straightforward Caesar cipher (ROT11).

In February 2025, Lumma Stealer obtained an replace that included a function for acquiring a brand new, main C&C URL from a Telegram channel dead-drop resolver. The C&C URL is extracted from the Telegram channel’s title subject, and it’s protected by the identical algorithm as within the case of the Steam profile dead-drop resolver. The primary distinction within the utilization of the Telegram and Steam profile dead-drop resolvers is that the Telegram possibility is examined first, whereas the Steam profile is used as a final resort if profitable communication has not been established with beforehand obtained C&C servers (Determine 16).

Furthermore, we consider that the Telegram dead-drop resolver is on the market for greater tier subscriptions. It’s because many samples shouldn’t have the Telegram URL set, and due to this fact the malware skips this methodology.

Lumma Stealer identifier

Every Lumma Stealer pattern comprises a singular hardcoded affiliate identifier often known as LID. It’s embedded in plaintext type and utilized for communication with C&C servers. Up till March 2025, the LID parameter string adopted a structured format, delimited by two dashes (Determine 7). A detailed evaluation of the LID affiliate string is supplied in an upcoming part.

Though essentially the most prevalent LID noticed throughout our monitoring begins with the string uz4s1o; the second most typical LID, which begins with LPnhqo, supplies a greater instance for visualizing typical LID variability. Within the phrase cloud in Determine 8, we current the highest 200 LIDs collected throughout our monitoring, beginning with LPnhqo.

Nonetheless, in early March 2025, Lumma Stealer transitioned to utilizing hexadecimal identifiers, referred to internally as UID (see Determine 9).

Elective configuration identifier

Along with the LID parameter, Lumma Stealer samples may include an non-compulsory parameter referred to internally as J. When current, this parameter is in cleartext and formatted as a 32-byte ASCII hex string (see Determine 10). The J parameter is utilized within the C&C request for dynamic configuration with further definitions for exfiltration. We discuss dynamic configuration in additional element in a following part.

If the J parameter is lacking within the Lumma Stealer pattern, an empty string is used within the C&C request and a default configuration is retrieved. Not like LID, the J parameter isn’t current in Lumma Stealer samples. Nonetheless, it performs a vital position when current, because it permits retrieving a dynamic configuration that considerably will increase the stealer’s capabilities, making it a extra versatile exfiltration device for risk actors.

In March 2025, when the LID parameter was renamed to UID and its format modified, the J parameter was renamed to CID however with no change to its format or perform.

Evaluation of static properties

From our long-term monitoring and statistical evaluation of LID parameters, we consider that the primary section of the LID identifies the affiliate, whereas the second section differentiates between campaigns. Primarily based on this assumption you possibly can see the highest 200 affiliate identifiers in Determine 11.

Furthermore, now we have been in a position to create a visualization of the associates’ actions over the previous yr (see Determine 12). This visualization highlights per week in January 2025. All these visualizations have supplied us with invaluable insights into the patterns and behaviors of various risk actors. Moreover, the visualizations reveal a shared, domain-based C&C infrastructure amongst most Lumma Stealer associates. On the identical time, we have been in a position to establish much less incessantly used C&C domains, which we suspect have been reserved for greater tier associates or extra necessary campaigns.

Dynamic properties of Lumma Stealer

Lumma Stealer retrieves a dynamic configuration from the C&C server, which comprises definitions specifying what to scan for exfiltration (see Desk 1). The first focus is on stealing net browser extension information and databases containing passwords, session cookies, net searching historical past, and autofill information. Moreover net browsers, it additionally focuses on stealing information from password managers, VPNs, FTP purchasers, cloud companies, distant desktop functions, electronic mail purchasers, cryptocurrency wallets, and note-taking functions.

Desk 1. Dynamic config’s JSON fields

Though we haven’t seen vital modifications within the default configurations, this function enhances the malware’s capability to carry out focused exfiltration (see Determine 13). A complete overview of the configuration fields has already been nicely documented on this analysis by SpyCloud.

The configuration is in JSON format, and it’s downloaded from the C&C server utilizing an HTTPS POST request that features the LID identifier, non-compulsory J parameter, and a selected hardcoded Consumer-Agent string.

The safety of the dynamic configuration has modified a number of instances just lately. Previously, it was protected in the identical means because the static C&C record, by a 32-byte XOR perform and base64 encoding. In March 2025 the safety modified to ChaCha20, the place the important thing and nonce have been prepended to the encrypted configuration.

The Consumer-Agent string is necessary to comply with, as offering it accurately is important for receiving the dynamic configuration. In April 2025, Lumma Stealer launched an extra layer of obfuscation by encrypting JSON values utilizing an 8-byte XOR perform (see Determine 14).

This encrypted variant of the dynamic configuration is delivered when a barely up to date Consumer-Agent string is specified (see Desk 2).

Desk 2. Consumer-Agent variants

Moreover this dynamic configuration strategy, Lumma Stealer samples nonetheless include hardcoded directions for exfiltrating information. These embody information from functions corresponding to Outlook or Thunderbird, Steam account info, and Discord account tokens (see this SpyCloud blogpost). This mixture of dynamic and hardcoded configurations ensures that Lumma Stealer can successfully gather a variety of invaluable information.

To summarize all of the static and dynamic modifications talked about thus far, now we have created a timeline (Determine 15) highlighting essentially the most vital developments noticed within the Lumma Stealer malware over the previous yr.

C&C communication

All through our Lumma Stealer monitoring interval, all extracted C&C domains constantly led to Cloudflare companies, that are utilized to hide Lumma Stealer’s actual C&C infrastructure. Cloudflare companies are additionally employed for C&C servers situated through dead-drop resolvers.

First, Lumma Stealer must receive an energetic C&C server. The mechanism of this alternative is illustrated within the circulate chart proven in Determine 16.

Handshake

Though the precise handshake request to the C&C server will not be current within the newest Lumma Stealer builds, it’s price mentioning as a result of it was a function of our monitoring for a very long time. The handshake request was an HTTPS POST request containing act=dwell and a hardcoded Consumer-Agent. Energetic servers responded with a cleartext okay message.

Configuration request

When Lumma Stealer identifies an energetic C&C server, it requests the configuration through an HTTPS POST request (Determine 17), which incorporates the LID and J parameters as information. If the J parameter will not be current within the pattern, Lumma Stealer retrieves the default configuration from the C&C server. This configuration specifies what to scan for exfiltration, permitting the malware to adapt to totally different targets and environments.

Further payload execution

After Lumma Stealer efficiently exfiltrates delicate information and harvested credentials, it points one ultimate HTTPS POST request to the C&C server – this time, with an extra sufferer {hardware} ID known as hwid. This ultimate request retrieves a configuration of an extra payload to be executed on the sufferer’s machine. The payload or a URL to obtain from is a part of that configuration. Word that such a payload will not be at all times supplied.

Anti-analysis obfuscation methods

Lumma Stealer employs a number of, however efficient, anti-emulation methods to make evaluation as sophisticated as potential. These methods are designed to evade detection and hinder the efforts of safety analysts.

Oblique soar obfuscation

One of many main obfuscation methods utilized by Lumma Stealer is oblique management circulate flattening, proven in Determine 18. This methodology successfully disrupts the code blocks of the capabilities, making it almost unattainable to maintain observe of the perform logic. By flattening the management circulate, the malware obfuscates its operations, complicating the evaluation course of. For an in depth exploration of this method and thorough evaluation of those obfuscation patterns, together with an overview of the answer, you possibly can confer with this complete article by Mandiant.

Stack strings

One other method employed by Lumma Stealer is the usage of encrypted stack strings, as illustrated in Determine 19. This methodology successfully hides binary information and plenty of necessary strings within the Lumma Stealer pattern, making static evaluation of the binary tough. Furthermore, every encrypted string has its personal distinctive mathematical perform for decryption, including one other layer of complexity to the evaluation course of.

Import API obfuscation

In Lumma Stealer, imports are resolved at runtime. Import names are hashed utilizing the FNV-1a algorithm with every construct utilizing a customized offset foundation. As proven in Determine 20, since August 25^th, 2024, Lumma Stealer additionally obfuscates the FNV hash algorithm parameters through the use of stack strings.

Conclusion

This world disruption operation was made potential by our long-term monitoring of Lumma Stealer, which now we have supplied an outline of on this blogpost. We’ve described the modus operandi of the Lumma Stealer group and its service. Moreover, now we have documented the necessary static identifiers and C&C communication in addition to its evolution over the past yr. Lastly, we summarized the important thing obfuscation methods that make the evaluation of Lumma Stealer difficult.

The disruption operation, led by Microsoft, goals to grab all identified Lumma Stealer C&C domains, rendering Lumma Stealer’s exfiltration infrastructure nonfunctional. ESET will proceed to trace different infostealers whereas carefully monitoring for Lumma Stealer exercise following this disruption operation.

For any inquiries about our analysis printed on WeLiveSecurity, please contact us at [email protected]. 

ESET Analysis presents non-public APT intelligence reviews and information feeds. For any inquiries about this service, go to the ESET Menace Intelligence web page.

IoCs

SHA-1	Filename	Detection	Description
6F94CFAABB19491F2B8E719D74AD032D4BEB3F29	AcroRd32.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-06-27.
C5D3278284666863D7587F1B31B06F407C592AC4	Notion.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-07-14.
5FA1EDC42ABB42D54D98FEE0D282DA453E200E99	explorer.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-08-08.
0D744811CF41606DEB41596119EC7615FFEB0355	aspnet_regiis.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-08-25.
2E3D4C2A7C68DE2DD31A8E0043D9CF7E7E20FDE1	nslookup.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-09-20.
09734D99A278B3CF59FE82E96EE3019067AF2AC5	nslookup.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-10-04.
1435D389C72A5855A5D6655D6299B4D7E78A0127	BitLockerToGo.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-11-09.
2CCCEA9E1990D6BC7755CE5C3B9B0E4C9A8F0B59	exterior.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2024-12-23.
658550E697D9499DB7821CBBBF59FFD39EB59053	Wemod-Premium-Unlocker-2025	MSIL/GenKryptik.HGWU	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2025-01-18.
070A001AC12139CC1238017D795A2B43AC52770D	khykuQw.exe	Win32/Kryptik.HYUC	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2025-02-27.
1FD806B1A0425340704F435CBF916B748801A387	Begin.exe	Win64/Injector.WR	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2025-03-24.
F4840C887CAAFF0D5E073600AEC7C96099E32030	loader.exe	Win64/Kryptik.FAZ	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2025-04-15.
8F58C4A16717176DFE3CD531C7E41BEF8CDF6CFE	Set-up.exe	Win32/Spy.Lumma Stealer.B	Lumma Stealer pattern – Construct 2025-04-23.

Community

MITRE ATT&CK methods

This desk was constructed utilizing model 17 of the MITRE ATT&CK framework.