Extra Flaws within the Robotaxi Revolution Dream

Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive degree summaries, join our day by day e-newsletter, and/or comply with us on Google Information!

I revealed an article the opposite day on flaws within the robotaxi revolution dream. It was based mostly on a reader remark that I needed to spotlight. Nevertheless, there was one other reader remark I had noticed to spotlight as effectively, and it will get even a bit extra granular. Right here’s that remark, from Matthew2312:

The whole robotaxi dialogue has by no means made any sense to me. Let’s have a look at the US market the place we have already got human drivers on demand wherever robotaxis are going to realistically function that already do all the things a robotaxi can do after which some. In consequence, we already know how large that market is (no less than on the present pricing).

• The full variety of taxis and rideshare autos within the US is round 2 million.
• Greater than 50% of all Uber journeys are package deal or meals supply. A robotaxi can not do most of that. So the full variety of autos concerned in individuals journeys is lower than a million.
• Almost the entire human rideshares are half time deployed belongings in contrast to robotaxis.
• If you happen to translated that to automated taxis at present pricing it’s possibly 800,000 autos.

Okay, so the market already exists, it’s absolutely served by human drivers, and it requires 800,000 autos. However what if the market grew? Might you massively minimize costs (say, by 50%) so that you’d get an enormous surge in ridership? No. Right here’s why:

• Rideshare drivers earn $25–$31 gross per hour. That’s earlier than deducting car prices. So the web will run $15–$20 an hour.
  • If you full all the maths, the driving force will get 35%–45% of the fare. So if that dropped to zero, you possibly can scale back the price by 40%. Nevertheless it received’t drop to zero as a result of the driving force additionally does a bunch of stuff somebody nonetheless must do, like sustaining the car (routine cleanout between rides and shifts, and many others.), monitoring the car’s situation, refueling, and many others. So let’s be beneficiant and say 35% financial savings.

Now, if the price was 35% much less per journey than it’s at this time, how a lot larger would the market be? 1.5×? It’s definitely not way more. So that’s 1.2 million autos? And the way worthwhile is that enterprise? The Uber a part of the enterprise continues to be barely worthwhile (and helped considerably by the package deal/meals supply service). If we dropped costs by 35%, the profitability could be close to zero. So to maintain an inexpensive gross margin, you can’t drop costs by greater than 20% which implies the market grows by what 25%? There may be simply not that a lot cash to be saved by eliminating the driving force and the elasticity of demand just isn’t that nice.

You’ll be able to construct a mannequin round this, however in a nutshell, there’s a million-vehicle enterprise right here that has the potential to generate a reasonably good $20 billion a yr in revenue within the US. Break up throughout a couple of operators, you’ll in all probability haircut that for competitors, however there are a couple of $5 billion a yr Web Revenue companies available. Definitely not hen feed, however not recreation altering both. Waymo will get its $5B. Who else?

Oh, and for Tesla, the robotaxi enterprise — if it reaches its full potential and Tesla is one of some leaders — might justify possibly 10% of the present valuation on an optimistic view. So there’s little shock that Musk shut down the evaluation.

Nice factors.