Nanomaterials are supplies with at the very least one dimension smaller than 100 nanometres (about 100,000 instances thinner than a human hair). Due to their tiny measurement, they’ve distinctive properties that may be helpful in lots of industries.1
Nevertheless, with out correct regulation, nanomaterials might pose dangers to human well being and the surroundings. A transparent and constant set of worldwide guidelines is required to handle these dangers whereas supporting innovation and protected improvement.
Governments around the globe acknowledge the necessity for clear guidelines to handle the protected improvement and use of nanomaterials. This part evaluations how totally different nations regulate them, together with processes for testing, approval, and monitoring.
European Union: REACH and Specialised Frameworks
The European Fee (EC) classifies nanotechnology as a Key Enabling Know-how (KET), which implies it performs an important function in innovation and industrial progress. Because of this, a number of EU companies and sector-specific laws have been developed to supervise nanomaterials.
Up to date Definition of Nanomaterials
On June 10, 2022, the European Union Observatory for Nanomaterials up to date its definition of nanomaterials. In response to this definition, nanomaterials embrace pure, incidental, or manufactured substances made up of particles or aggregates smaller than 100 nanometres. These tiny particles should account for greater than 50 % of the fabric.
For sure security assessments, this 50 % threshold could also be adjusted to a variety between 1 % and 50 %. The definition additionally particularly contains supplies like carbon nanotubes (CNTs), fullerenes, and two-dimensional supplies resembling graphene, which might have a number of dimensions beneath 1 nanometre.2
Different EU companies could use barely totally different definitions relying on their regulatory wants, however that is the newest EU-wide replace.
Nanomaterial Regulation beneath REACH
Below the EU’s REACH regulation (Registration, Analysis, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical compounds), nanomaterials are known as “nanoforms.” Any firm manufacturing or importing nanomaterials within the EU should register these substances and supply detailed data on their security.
Since January 1, 2020, new authorized necessities have made it necessary for corporations to adjust to particular guidelines for nanoforms. Key adjustments launched by the 2018 modification embrace:
- Corporations should outline the nanoform clearly and embrace its toxicological profile within the registration paperwork (Regulation (EU) 2018/1881).
- A full danger evaluation have to be submitted by the producer.
- Commonplace data have to be included in a technical file and chemical security report, together with steering for downstream customers.
- Corporations can group nanoforms with related properties to simplify documentation.3
By imposing these necessities, the EU goals to enhance security within the manufacturing and use of nanomaterials and assist accountable innovation.
Nanomaterials and the European Chemical compounds Company (ECHA)
The European Chemical compounds Company (ECHA) performs a central function in overseeing the regulation of nanomaterials beneath the EU’s REACH and CLP (Classification, Labelling and Packaging) frameworks. It supplies up to date steering paperwork and helps each inside and exterior coaching packages associated to nanomaterial improvement.
ECHA additionally contributes to worldwide regulatory efforts, such because the Malta Initiative, which focuses on creating testing pointers for nanomaterials. As well as, ECHA established the EU Observatory for Nanomaterials (EUON) in 2011, which turned absolutely operational by 2016–2017 to enhance transparency and assist protected use of nanomaterials throughout the EU.
Nanomaterials Professional Group beneath ECHA
ECHA additionally arrange the Nanomaterials Professional Group (NMEG) in 2012, in collaboration with REACH and CLP. This advisory group helps ECHA’s methods for making certain the protected improvement of nanomaterials and helps resolve technical points associated to their regulation.4 In 2024, NMEG printed a guide figuring out S-CIRCABC as the principle platform for sharing nanomaterials-related documentation.5
European Meals Security Authority on Nanotechnology
The European Meals Security Authority (EFSA) has printed steering on assessing the dangers of nanomaterials utilized in meals merchandise. Often known as the Scientific Committee steering on Nano-risk evaluation (SC steering), it outlines the technical necessities for evaluating particles resembling nanoparticles.
The steering contains detailed directions on characterize the bodily and chemical properties of nanomaterials, in addition to assess publicity and establish potential well being hazards. Candidates are liable for choosing acceptable testing strategies and clearly justifying their strategy.
Threat assessments should mix knowledge from hazard identification, publicity evaluations, and some other related sources. The objective is an entire image of the nanomaterial’s security for its supposed use, together with any uncertainties or circumstances that have an effect on the outcomes. All documentation should adjust to REACH and CLP laws to make sure the safety of human and animal well being.
United States: Regulation By Current Frameworks
In the USA, nanomaterials are regulated utilizing current legal guidelines reasonably than by nano-specific laws.
Picture Credit score: PanuShot/Shutterstock.com
Environmental Safety Company (EPA) and TSCA
The nanomaterials are regulated by the EPA beneath the Poisonous Substance Management Act (TSCA) as chemical substances. The Environmental Safety Company (EPA) oversees nanomaterials beneath the Poisonous Substances Management Act (TSCA), treating them as chemical substances.
In 2017, the EPA launched a rule requiring one-time reporting and recordkeeping for sure nanomaterials already in use. Producers, together with importers and processors, should submit particulars resembling chemical id, manufacturing quantity, manufacturing strategies, makes use of, and any obtainable well being and security knowledge.7
For brand spanking new nanomaterials, TSCA requires producers to inform the EPA at the very least 135 days earlier than starting manufacturing. This pre-manufacturing evaluation helps assess potential dangers. To assist these necessities, the EPA created the Chemical Data Submission System (CISS), which permits corporations to submit knowledge electronically beneath TSCA sections 4, 8(a), and eight(d).8
Nanomaterials Regulation beneath the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration
The U.S. Meals and Drug Administration regulates merchandise containing nanomaterials beneath current authorized requirements based mostly on product kind.
As a result of nanomaterials can behave in a different way than typical supplies, the FDA has issued steering titled Drug Merchandise, Together with Organic Merchandise, that Include Nanomaterials: Steerage for Trade, which outlines consider their security, high quality, and efficiency.
The steering emphasizes the significance of full characterization of nanomaterials, together with construction, physico-chemical stability, and demanding high quality attributes (CQAs).
It notes that whereas some standardized strategies for characterizing nanomaterials exist already, resembling ISO 22412:2017 and ASTM E2859-11(2017), others are nonetheless being developed. Candidates should fastidiously assess whether or not the chosen strategies are acceptable for the particular nanomaterial in query.
As well as, all drug merchandise that comprise nanomaterials have to be manufactured in compliance with present good manufacturing practices (CGMP), as required by part 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Meals, Drug, and Beauty (FD&C) Act.
The FDA additionally requires that storage circumstances, shelf life, and in-use circumstances be backed by knowledge confirming the chemical and bodily stability of the product. Scientific improvement should comply with all relevant security and efficacy requirements.9
U.S. Client Product Security Fee (CPSC)
The U.S. Client Product Security Fee (CPSC) has sought to handle potential dangers related to nanomaterials by making use of its current regulatory frameworks. At the moment, CPSC employees are working to replace power hazard pointers to raised mirror the usage of nanomaterials in client merchandise. Central to this effort are hazard identification and a radical evaluation of toxicity knowledge.
CPSC can be actively concerned in a number of collaborative initiatives with federal and personal organizations targeted on nanomaterial manufacturing and use. These embrace participation within the Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Know-how (NSET) subcommittee and the Nanotechnology Environmental Well being Points (NEHI) working group. By these efforts, the company helps knowledge sharing and greatest practices for nanomaterial regulation.10
Whereas no nanomaterial-specific federal or state legal guidelines exist within the U.S., regulatory our bodies have tailored current chemical security frameworks to incorporate nanoscale substances. Regardless of this, stronger, devoted laws remains to be wanted to make sure enough human well being and environmental safety.
Canada: Coordinated Threat-Primarily based Strategy
Canadian Environmental Safety Act, 1999
Below the Canadian Environmental Safety Act of 1999 (CEPA 1999), main chemical substances (together with nanomaterials) are regulated as a part of Canada’s strategy to environmental and human well being safety.
Current nanomaterials are these with nanoscale types listed on the Home Substances Listing (DSL). Nevertheless, the Chemical compounds Administration Plan (CMP) doesn’t particularly deal with the chance evaluation of those nanoscale types.11
In 2022, Canada launched the Framework for the Threat Evaluation of Manufactured Nanomaterials beneath CEPA 1999, providing a foundational information for evaluating new and current nanomaterials. Newly developed nanomaterials are topic to the New Substances Notification Laws (Chemical compounds and Polymers).
This framework enabled employees from Setting and Local weather Change Canada (ECCC) and Well being Canada (HC) to assemble data and compile a listing of nanomaterials presently utilized in commerce. The info was then used to assist prioritize substances for danger evaluation.
The framework additionally launched the usage of Threat Quotients (RQ) and Margins of Publicity (MOE) to evaluate environmental and well being impacts. An RQ equal to or higher than 1 signifies a possible hazard.
Well being dangers are evaluated by analyzing particular hazards, publicity ranges, and related routes of contact for every nanomaterial. Threat to Canadians is assessed based mostly on potential publicity by client merchandise, meals, water, and environmental contact, with specific consideration paid to susceptible populations.12
Function of Well being Canada
Well being Canada depends on current legal guidelines and laws to evaluate and handle potential well being dangers related to nanomaterials. The division evaluates the security of nano-enabled merchandise and substances containing nanomaterials on a case-by-case foundation.
In collaboration with Setting and Local weather Change Canada, Well being Canada participates within the Canada–United States Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Nanotechnology Initiative. This initiative helps data sharing and the event of joint methods, together with standardized terminology, naming conventions, and harmonized approaches to danger evaluation and regulatory oversight.13
China: Evolving Requirements and Institutional Growth
China is quickly advancing in nanotechnology, and regulatory techniques are creating in parallel.
In 2011, the Nationwide Nanotechnology Standardization Technical Committee (NSTC) and Technical Committee 279 (TC279), working beneath the Standardization Administration of China (SAC), started reviewing and drafting key requirements associated to nanomaterials. These lined terminology, testing strategies, and security issues for nanoscale supplies and biomedical purposes.
NSTC-TC has additionally contributed to the event of testing protocols and technical requirements for industrial and lab use, supporting utilized analysis throughout sectors.
A toxicology database for nanomaterials is in improvement to assist inform security requirements for manufacturing, packaging, and transport. Whereas SAC/TC279 manages these requirements, most stay voluntary, and the excellence between voluntary and necessary implementation is just not all the time clear.14
In 2021, China launched nationwide customary GB/T30544.1, requiring candidates to design security exams for biomedical gadgets containing nanomaterials. These exams should account for key dangers such because the dosage and launch charge of nanoparticles, in addition to the route of publicity.15
Though nonetheless maturing, China’s regulatory panorama is progressively increasing to cowl sectors like meals, agriculture, and office security.
Japan: Case-by-Case Evaluation Utilizing Current Legal guidelines
Japan doesn’t have a devoted regulatory framework or authority particular to nanomaterials. As an alternative, security issues associated to their use are addressed by professional groups on a case-by-case foundation.
At the moment, current laws resembling Roudou Anzen Eisei Ho (the Industrial Security and Well being Act) and Haikibutsu Shori Ho (the Chemical Substances Management Act) is utilized to control nanomaterials. Whereas these legal guidelines will not be nano-specific, they supply the idea for oversight.
The Ministry of Economic system, Commerce and Trade and the Ministry of Well being, Labor, and Welfare have been actively concerned in researching nanomaterial security.16 In recent times, Japan has additionally begun collaborating with worldwide organizations such because the European Medicines Company (EMA) to develop extra tailor-made pointers and requirements for nanomedicines. These efforts mirror Japan’s rising dedication to strengthening its regulatory strategy and defending public well being.
Australia: Sector-Particular Oversight and Threat Instruments
Australia takes a coordinated strategy to managing the dangers of nanomaterials, specializing in each environmental and human well being. A number of companies oversee their use throughout totally different sectors.
Till 2020, industrial nanomaterials have been regulated by the Nationwide Industrial Chemical compounds Notification and Evaluation Scheme (NICNAS). This function is now dealt with by the Australian Industrial Chemical compounds Introduction Scheme (AICIS), which evaluates the security of nanomaterials utilized in merchandise like paints, dyes, pesticides, and cosmetics.
Office publicity is managed by Secure Work Australia, which supplies steering to scale back well being dangers from supplies like carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Within the meals sector, Meals Requirements Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) is liable for regulating nanomaterials utilized in meals and packaging. For medical gadgets, oversight falls beneath the Therapeutic Items Administration (TGA), whereas the Australian Competitors and Client Fee (ACCC) displays normal client merchandise that comprise nanomaterials.
To assist protected use, regulatory our bodies have developed danger evaluation instruments. For instance, Office Well being and Security Queensland (WHSQ) created a management banding worksheet to assist analysis establishments and industrial customers assess nanomaterial publicity. The instrument calculates severity scores and estimates publicity chances.18
Universities like UNSW and Griffith College are additionally contributing by creating sensible instruments and checklists for evaluating nanomaterial dangers. These mixed efforts assist guarantee thorough evaluation of each current nanomaterials and new nano-enabled merchandise earlier than they attain the market.
International Alignment and the Path Ahead
Though many nations have made progress in regulating nanomaterials, international alignment stays a significant problem. Variations in danger thresholds, regulatory definitions, and reporting necessities make it troublesome to create a unified worldwide framework.
The EU has led the best way by its REACH laws, which requires detailed security assessments and technical documentation for nanoforms. Nevertheless, many different areas nonetheless depend on older or extra normal chemical laws that won’t absolutely account for the distinctive properties of nanomaterials.
Producers usually wrestle with inconsistent knowledge necessities when registering merchandise in several nations. Various requirements for testing strategies and formatting create obstacles to worldwide compliance and improve prices for international corporations. These points spotlight the necessity for a extra standardized regulatory system worldwide.
Efforts are underway to handle this. Worldwide organizations just like the Worldwide Group for Standardization (ISO) and the Organisation for Financial Co-operation and Growth (OECD) are working with nationwide governments to develop shared testing protocols and knowledge submission templates.
Regardless of ongoing challenges, nanomaterials proceed to drive innovation in science and know-how. Researchers are exploring greener, extra sustainable nanomaterials to assist international local weather and improvement targets. In the meantime, new instruments like synthetic intelligence (AI) and machine studying (ML) are getting used to enhance toxicology predictions.
With continued worldwide cooperation, the way forward for nanomaterial regulation will doubtless change into extra aligned, clear, and attentive to rising applied sciences.
References and Additional Studying
- Pacific Northwest Nationwide Laboratory (PNNL), Division of Energ, Gov. of USA. (2025). What are nanomaterials? [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.pnnl.gov/explainer-articles/nanomaterials [Accessed on: April 15, 2025].
- European Union Observatory for Nanomaterials, (EUON). (2025). Definition of nanomaterial. [Online]. Accessible at: https://euon.echa.europa.eu/definition-of-nanomaterial [Accessed on: April 15, 2025].
- Workplace Journal of the European Union. (2018). COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2018/1881 of three December 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Analysis, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical compounds (REACH) as regards Annexes I, III,VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, and XII to handle nanoforms of drugs. L 308. [Online]. Accessible at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R1881 [Accessed on: April 16, 2025].
- European Chemical compounds Company (ECHA), (2025). Nanomaterials Laws. [Online]. Accessible at: https://echa.europa.eu/laws/nanomaterials [Accessed on: April 17, 2025].
- Nanomaterials Professional Group (NMEG), ECH. (2024). ECHA NMEG Guide. Model 4. Accessible at: https://echa.europa.eu/search?p_p_id=com_liferay_portal_search_web_portlet_SearchPortlet&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_mode=view&_com_liferay_portal_search_web_portlet_SearchPortlet_mvcPath=%2Fsearch.jsp [Accessed on: April 17, 2025].
- EFSA Scientific Committee, Extra S. et. al. (2021). Steerage on danger evaluation of nanomaterials to be utilized within the meals and feed chain: Human and animal well being. EFSA Journal. 19(8). e06768. Accessible at: https://www.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6768
- United States Environmental Safety Company (EPA). (2024). Truth Sheet: Nanoscale Supplies. Reviewing New Chemical compounds beneath the Poisonous Substances Management Act (TSCA). [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.epa.gov/reviewing-new-chemicals-under-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca/fact-sheet-nanoscale-materials#:~:textual content=Aspercent20partpercent20ofpercent20thepercent20Agency’s,substancespercent20inpercent20commercepercent20pursuantpercent20to [Accessed on: April 17, 2025].
- United States Environmental Safety Company (EPA). (2017). Chemical Substances When Manufactured or Processed as Nanoscale Supplies: TSCA Reporting and Recordkeeping Necessities. Environmental Safety; Chemical compounds; Hazardous Supplies; Recordkeeping and Reporting Necessities; Reporting and Recordkeeping Necessities. 40 CFR Half 704. 3641 – 3655. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0572-0137. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.laws.gov/doc/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0572-0137 [Accessed on: April 17, 2025].
- U.S. Division of Well being and Human Companies Meals and Drug Administration. (2022). Drug Merchandise, Together with Organic Merchandise, that Include Nanomaterials Steerage for Trade. 19640025 FNL. 1-29. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.fda.gov/media/157812/obtain?attachment [Accessed on: April 17, 2025].
- U.S. Client Product Security Fee (CPSC) (2024). CPSC Nanomaterial Assertion. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/CPSCNanostatement.pdf [Accessed on: April 18, 2025].
- Authorities of Canada. (2025). Nanomaterials, Chemical Security: Chemical Substances. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/providers/chemical-substances/nanomaterials.html [Accessed on: April 20, 2025].
- Setting and Local weather Change Canada, Well being Canada. (2022). Framework for the chance evaluation of manufactured nanomaterials beneath the Canadian Environmental Safety Act, 1999 (draft). A-Z index: substances addressed within the third part of the Chemical compounds Administration Plan. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.canada.ca/content material/dam/eccc/paperwork/pdf/pded/nanomaterials/Framework-risk-assessment-nanomaterials.pdf [Accessed on: April 20, 2025]
- Authorities of Canada. (2024). Regulating Nanomaterials at Well being Canada. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/providers/science-research/emerging-technology/nanotechnology/regulating-nanomaterials.html [Accessed on: April 21, 2025].
- Jarvis D. et. al. (2011). Regulation and Governance of Nanotechnology in China: Regulatory Challenges and Effectiveness. European Journal of Regulation and Know-how, Vol. 2, No.3. Accessible at: https://www.ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/obtain/94/155?inline=1
- Yang, D. et. al. (2021). NMPA Initiates Regulation of Nanomaterials in Medical Units. [Online]. Accessible at: https://cisema.com/en/nmpa-initiates-regulation-of-nanomaterials-in-medical-devices/ [Accessed on: April 22, 2025].
- Nasu, H. et. al. (2013). Nanotechnology in Japan: A path to power safety after Fukushima?. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 69(5), 68-74. Accessible at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340213501367
- Prof. Jagadish et. al. (2019). Nanotechnology Regulation in Australia. Australian Academy of Science. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.science.org.au/curious/technology-future/nanotechnology-regulation-australia#:~:textual content=Worksafepercent20Australiapercent20ispercent20responsiblepercent20for,fallpercent20underpercent20otherpercent20regulatorypercent20jurisdictions. [Accessed on: April 22, 2025].
- Office Well being and Security Queensland. (2025). Nanomaterial management banding danger evaluation. [Online]. Accessible at: https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/safety-and-prevention/hazards/hazardous-exposures/nanotechnology/nanomaterial-control-banding-risk-assessment [Accessed on: April 22, 2025].