Google’s John Mueller just about stated that utilizing picture streaming methods is not going to end in an web optimization pleasant final result. He really stated, “It is an effective way to forestall your photographs from being discovered via search engines like google and yahoo.”
The query was introduced up by Myriam Jessier who requested, “if I work with a consumer that makes use of picture streaming of their content material, what’s your take/recommendation/opinion?”
John Mueller replied on Bluesky with that remark, “It is an effective way to forestall your photographs from being discovered via search engines like google and yahoo.”
I do not assume I’ve lined picture streaming earlier than however this web site describes it as “As an alternative of importing particular person picture recordsdata resembling JPEGs, PNGs or GIFs on to a web site, photographs are embedded utilizing a chunk of code, very similar to you’ll embed a YouTube video.” I imply, it is sensible that these photographs wouldn’t be listed by Google if they’re embedded like a video…
So I assume do not do it if you’d like these photographs listed by Google.
Listed here are these posts:
@johnmu.com @divingfor.enjoyable Bonjour, I’ve a picture web optimization query: if I work with a consumer that makes use of picture streaming of their content material, what’s your take/recommendation/opinion?
smartframe.io/weblog/image-s….
I’m slowly attempting to wrap my head round it.
— Myriam Jessier (@myriam.dopamine.builders) April 22, 2025 at 2:41 AM
It is an effective way to forestall your photographs from being discovered via search engines like google and yahoo.
— John Mueller (@johnmu.com) April 22, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Discussion board dialogue at Bluesky.