The opinions expressed right here by Trellis professional contributors are their very own, not these of Trellis.
On the federal degree, if environmental rules are going wherever proper now, they’re going away. On the similar time, seven states are utterly overhauling the $107 billion trade that determines how the world’s largest financial system packages its items. They usually’re doing it by way of a coverage most customers have by no means heard of: Prolonged Producer Accountability.
Prolonged Producer Accountability (EPR) is a sort of coverage that applies the “polluter pays” precept to packaging. In different phrases, those that pollute are held liable for their actions — comparable to corporations paying fines for emissions beneath the Clear Air Act.
With EPR legal guidelines, the polluter pays precept applies to product packaging supplies we use each day, from cereal bins to subscription field containers. In passing these legal guidelines, states are tackling waste upstream and downstream: EPR ought to shift the monetary accountability of recycling and waste administration from taxpayers onto producers, and it ought to incentivize corporations to develop extra recyclable, refillable or compostable packaging by levying larger charges on packaging that’s much less environmentally pleasant.
For the optimists in sustainability and packaging, EPR would possibly really feel like the one path ahead. It guarantees a extra round system the place product and packaging producers fund all the pieces from shopper schooling to curbside recycling assortment — and little doubt, the potential is there. However to attain this potential, EPR stakeholders want to beat the pitfalls behind three guarantees:
1. EPR will enhance recycling infrastructure — if it’s finished accurately
EPR legal guidelines promise to generate funds that modernize and increase recycling programs to assist make sure the supplies you’re placing in your recycling bin really get recycled.
However right here’s the fact test: Constructing higher infrastructure isn’t nearly funding — it’s about making calculated and applicable investments. The trade can try this through the use of present infrastructure first, as a result of constructing one thing comparable to a brand new Materials Restoration Facility can price upwards of $65 million. Plus, disrupted provide chains, prolonged allowing processes, group planning and stakeholder engagement all require time and belief that can not be rushed.
Transferring ahead, sensible EPR implementation will construct on what’s working — comparable to Oregon’s EPR plan that has begun funding new facility upgrades at materials restoration services and buying new vehicles — and fill in gaps throughout recycling programs moderately than begin from scratch.
2. EPR will incentivize higher packaging design — nevertheless it’ll take time
As a result of EPR will make corporations pay charges primarily based on how tough it’s to handle their packaging as soon as it’s been used, the coverage’s best promise is creating monetary incentives to design packaging that’s simpler to recycle, makes use of fewer supplies or eliminates problematic elements altogether.
Underneath EPR, market forces ought to drive extra environmentally pleasant design decisions. In actuality although, design improvements take time — particularly for advanced product and package deal mixtures.
Transforming a packaging’s design is very technical. It requires a big funding to develop a package deal from R&D to product distribution that may take as much as 10 years. And for advanced meals or pharmaceutical merchandise, an organization can’t merely swap paper in for plastic in a single day. The intersection of security, compliance and recyclability creates time-intensive, advanced design puzzles.
Swaps for extra sustainable choices — comparable to Graza Olive Oil utilizing recyclable aluminum cans as an alternative of single-use plastic pouches — could be thrilling beacons of change. The important thing transferring ahead will probably be managing expectations: EPR charges will drive packaging innovation, however the timeline will fluctuate drastically relying on the product class and its complexity.
3. EPR will embody extra stakeholders — which implies extra cooks within the kitchen
Throughout the U.S., state municipalities are tasked with waste and recycling administration, which implies native governments are on the middle of those programs. EPR legal guidelines, nevertheless, power an enormous tent. They require the cooperation of a broad coalition of stakeholders composed of native recyclers, lawmakers, producers and different actors.
Ideally, because the proverbial desk grows, so does our collective capacity to enhance the system. Because of this legislators have handed EPR — to contain producers and make them “accountable” for his or her packaging. However for a state comparable to California, with an financial system bigger than most nations, this requires a disparate group of stakeholders to achieve a consensus on EPR implementation.
To advance impactful implementation, states can standardize their EPR legal guidelines. Harmonizing key components comparable to how a state defines a “producer” or the way it determines which supplies will probably be regulated can ease cross-state compliance. And we’re already seeing how this potential can play out: In Maine, the primary state to cross EPR, lawmakers lately standardized their legislation with different states’ EPR legal guidelines to deliver consistency throughout definitions.
The rubber is assembly the street now
EPR legal guidelines have super potential. They might utterly overhaul our nation’s relationship to waste and recycling — however proper now, we must always average these hopes. The coverage’s full influence hinges on its stakeholders’ capacity to strategically spend money on waste and recycling programs, rapidly implement higher packaging design and be certain that stakeholders from shopper teams to Fortune 500 corporations are on board for the modifications in retailer.
Proper now, the world is watching as the primary states roll out their EPR legal guidelines. The outcomes will supply a essential window into whether or not the nation is able to embrace a really round future. It’s time to remain tuned.
